All parliamentary appearances
Entries 5141 to 5150 of 9741.
-
15 Aug 2014 in Senate:
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Is the Chairperson of the Committee in order to misinterpret our contribution? It is not that we doubted his words, but we were insisting that he confirm to us whether, indeed, that legal officer is an expert and authority on the Kamba language. We gave you various alternatives, including interpretations by leaders from that community who have been communicating with us. Is he in order to mislead?
view
-
15 Aug 2014 in Senate:
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Is the Chairperson of the Committee in order to misinterpret our contribution? It is not that we doubted his words, but we were insisting that he confirm to us whether, indeed, that legal officer is an expert and authority on the Kamba language. We gave you various alternatives, including interpretations by leaders from that community who have been communicating with us. Is he in order to mislead?
view
-
15 Aug 2014 in Senate:
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir.
view
-
15 Aug 2014 in Senate:
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir.
view
-
15 Aug 2014 in Senate:
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir.
view
-
15 Aug 2014 in Senate:
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir.
view
-
15 Aug 2014 in Senate:
I want to speak on her point of order.
view
-
15 Aug 2014 in Senate:
I want to speak on her point of order.
view
-
15 Aug 2014 in Senate:
Mr. Speaker, Sir, according to Sen. Elachi, pursuant to Standing Order No.54(3), she is requesting you to move to another date the putting of the question and her reason is that we have less than 24 delegations. I would like her to guide us, which point of order in the Standing Order requires that before we take today’s vote, we must have 24 delegations present. Could she kindly direct us to that point of order in these Standing Orders before you give assent to her request? My submission is that if she fails to direct us to that kind of ...
view
-
15 Aug 2014 in Senate:
Mr. Speaker, Sir, according to Sen. Elachi, pursuant to Standing Order No.54(3), she is requesting you to move to another date the putting of the question and her reason is that we have less than 24 delegations. I would like her to guide us, which point of order in the Standing Order requires that before we take today’s vote, we must have 24 delegations present. Could she kindly direct us to that point of order in these Standing Orders before you give assent to her request? My submission is that if she fails to direct us to that kind of ...
view