Dr. Bonny Khalwale

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 8471 to 8480 of 9741.

• 1 Apr 2010 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. With all due respect, I beg that you bear with me. I am completely at a loss because to my understanding, we have come to the end of the Motion. If that is the case, my understanding is that this was going to be an opportunity for Mr. Abdikadir to address us briefly and then the Prime Minister and the President. That we are doing what we are doing, it is my submission that we are not helping the constitutional process in this country. I beg to be guided. view
• 31 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. If the hon. Member is confirming that he was arrested because of the issues he is raising, then I would request the Chair to defer the Question until the House confirms that the matter is not sub judice because obviously, it has that kind of weight. view
• 31 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am waiting for you attention because you are supposed to rule on this point of order. If you have listened to Mr. James Orengo, you will find that the amendment he has introduced takes us back to the same Motion on which we took a vote in the morning. The uniformed forces he has been listing are the same ones that were listed in the morning. The point of order is for you to give direction as to whether having lost the Motion this morning, it should again be put to the vote simply because ... view
• 31 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. The amendment to the amendment is about a constitutional Motion and, therefore, the Chair should reconsider whether we can--- view
• 31 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Yes, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. I have listened to the Attorney- General very carefully. view
• 31 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: I want to say that he has demonstrated brilliance over a legal argument that joins very well with the practice of medicine. Why? This particular Article has challenges to two groups of people. One, the pro-life and, two, the pro-choice. If you go by the amendment of the Attorney-General part two satisfies the pro-life. But if you remove Section 4, the pro-choice because she is not seeing the word “abortion” in the document, she feels that she has been left out. However, the pro-choice is saying that I want to have access to medical expertise. The Attorney-General is telling us ... view
• 31 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would like to support the Attorney-General for those reasons. The word “abortion” appearing in this document will meet the wrath of the millions of Christians who will be participating in the Referendum. Let us wait as Members of Parliament for the time of legislation to then make the broad Act that will capture the interest of the pro-choice. view
• 31 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: With those few remarks, I second. view
• 31 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am now contributing to the Motion as amended. I would like to support this Motion as amended because I can see from the point of view of the Minister for Public Health, with all due respect, you might be becoming emotional. Let me just talk to you as a doctor of medicine. The amendment you have made--- view
• 31 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am talking through the Chair. This is important. view