Cherarkey K Samson

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 5651 to 5660 of 7129.

• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: or legs from hands. What is observed is correct, but when it comes to recommendations, you cannot tell. Mr. Speaker, Sir, as I conclude, when you read the book Devolution in Kenya, Thomas Tödtling observes that devolution can be a roaring lion. However, when you look at this Report, devolution is a dying rhino because this is a white elephant as compared to view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: written by Thomas Tödtling. Therefore, I request that under Standing Order No.58, after the six months, in your discretion, we must bring it back and relook at it. This is so that the right people can be punished and the correct private entities can be punished. The value for money that is given for these people would be ensured. view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I do not mind. view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, thank you. Thank you for that information from my colleague. Finally, this was a grand scheme that was aimed to fleece counties. Under Article 43 (1) on the right to health is that every person has the right to the highest attainable standard of healthcare. I oppose and reject this report in totality. view
• 24 Sep 2020 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, pursuant to Standing Order No.48(1), I rise to seek a Statement from the Standing on National Security and Foreign Relations on the issue of new police uniforms in Kenya. In the Statement, the Committee should- (1) State whether there is a Kenya Police Uniform Policy Guideline in place. (2) Explain whether a circular is in place indicating to the police that they can purchase the uniforms on their own at the recommended retailers. (3) State whether the National Police Service (NPS) has provided uniform allowance to the officers to enable them purchase the uniforms on their own. ... view
• 24 Sep 2020 in Senate: I just wanted to make a rider on the issue so that--- view
• 24 Sep 2020 in Senate: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Sir. view
• 24 Sep 2020 in Senate: Madam Temporary Speaker, I do not know whether you will allow me to raise my point at this stage. This is because you made a ruling earlier on, on the amendments in line with Standing Order No. 64. I read an amendment that you disapproved earlier on, or you had not approved at that point in time. I was seeking a substantive ruling as per Standing Order No. 64, on the fate of my amendment that I had raised earlier against this Report. I thank you. view
• 24 Sep 2020 in Senate: Sen. Olekina can go first. view
• 24 Sep 2020 in Senate: Madam Temporary Speaker, I have read Standing Order 63. The matter was brought to the attention of the Speaker yesterday evening. I notified him. In line with Standing Order 64, I agree with what Sen. Sakaja has said that we need a substantive ruling on this. If we disallow these amendments, it means that we are stifling the Members in debating this issue. This is why we are requesting a substantive ruling as per Standing Order 64. view