Gitobu Imanyara

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 2651 to 2660 of 6851.

• 14 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Order! Order! It is not the Attorney-General’s President. It is our President. view
• 14 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Hon. Members, let us bring this matter to an end. These are procedural issues. view
• 14 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Order! Order! I have heard the arguments from the hon. Members who raised very valid concerns. I have also heard the Attorney-General’s response. I am convinced that this Order is inadmissible. I shall communicate the reasons in a considered communication from the Chair. As of now, the Chair is convinced that this order, as drawn, is inadmissible. view
• 14 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Next order! view
• 14 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Chairman, did you want to make a clarification? view
• 14 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: He was informing the Member. She requested and the Chair allowed him. So, there is nothing out of order there. view
• 14 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Order! If you are not certain of what you want to raise then, please, do not raise it! view
• 14 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: What is your point of order? That is what I am asking you. view
• 14 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Okemo, let me put my colleague in peace because he seems to think that the Chair is wrong. I want to bring to the attention of Mr. Ethuro the provisions of Standing Order No.74 which permits a Member who has spoken to give an explanation. That is why I have allowed Mr. Okemo to do that. Mr. Ethuro you can be reading the provisions of Standing Order No.74. view
• 14 Dec 2011 in National Assembly: For the benefit of Mr. Ethuro, I just want to read to you now the provisions of Standing Order No.74 (1):- “No Member shall speak more than once to a question except in Committee of the whole House provided that:- (i) a Member who has spoken on a question may again be heard to offer explanation of some material part of the Member’s speech which has been misunderstood, but must not introduce new matter. Mrs. Shebesh simply sought the Mover to explain and it is permitted by the Standing Orders. Does anybody else want to contribute? view