23 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
The court found the case not proved that he had those items in his possession.
view
23 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Just a moment, Mr. Assistant Minister. The officer was subjected to court proceedings in a criminal case and acquitted. So, the question that you are being asked is that if a court cleared and found him to be innocent, on what basis are you finding him guilty on the same circumstances?
view
23 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Let him respond to this first.
view
23 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
No, Mr. Assistant Minister---
view
23 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Order, Mr. Assistant Minister! I just want you to clarify this: You are telling this House that you subjected this officer to double jeopardy. You said that you subjected him to the Orderly Room proceedings and then you charged him in a court of law on the same facts where he was acquitted for lack of evidence and you have continued to punish him for that. Is that what you are telling this House?
view
23 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Order, Mr. Assistant Minister! You are now treading---
view
23 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Order, Mr. Assistant Minister! You know these are very serious issues that are being raised. Please, treat them with the seriousness they deserve. Clerks-at-the-Table, may the Chair peruse that judgment that has been tabled?
view
23 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
It is a properly signed court proceedings, Mr. Assistant Minister. Have you had a look at them? Have you seen these proceedings?
view
23 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Have you seen the proceedings?
view
23 Nov 2011 in National Assembly:
Have you seen what he was charged with?
view