Gitobu Imanyara

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 3351 to 3360 of 6851.

• 18 Oct 2011 in National Assembly: Precisely, what you did last time. view
• 18 Oct 2011 in National Assembly: Next Order! view
• 18 Oct 2011 in National Assembly: Order, Mr. Michuki! I do not want to interrupt you but you are seconding the Finance Bill not answering the questions that were handled by the Minister at that time. view
• 18 Oct 2011 in National Assembly: Restrict yourself to the Finance Bill. That is all I am asking. I am asking you to--- view
• 18 Oct 2011 in National Assembly: You can continue but I just said you are seconding the Finance Bill. Therefore, be relevant to the Bill. That is the function of the Chair to determine what is relevant and what is not relevant. view
• 8 Sep 2011 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. I do recall that this is an issue that has previously come before this House and allegations have been made. I am just seeking your guidance on whether that has been investigated before this Question is answered because it touches on the answer that will be provided. view
• 8 Sep 2011 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. I do recall that this is an issue that has previously come before this House and allegations have been made. I am just seeking your guidance on whether that has been investigated before this Question is answered because it touches on the answer that will be provided. view
• 8 Sep 2011 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Is it in order for the Minister to suggest that it is the hon. Member who was not satisfied when, indeed, it was the Chair that was not satisfied? Indeed, it was the Chair that was asking questions. Is it in order for him to impute improper motives on the Member when we know it is the Chair that demanded a satisfactory answer? view
• 8 Sep 2011 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Is it in order for the Minister to suggest that it is the hon. Member who was not satisfied when, indeed, it was the Chair that was not satisfied? Indeed, it was the Chair that was asking questions. Is it in order for him to impute improper motives on the Member when we know it is the Chair that demanded a satisfactory answer? view
• 8 Sep 2011 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, the Chair as constituted on the two occasions that this matter came up was not you. On the two occasions I happened to be in the House. The Chair participated fully in questioning the Minister and concluded that the answer was not satisfactory. The House actually applauded the Chair when he came to that conclusion. view