Irungu Kang'ata

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 1541 to 1550 of 1643.

• 24 Oct 2013 in National Assembly: The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 23 Oct 2013 in National Assembly: Thank you, hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker. I rise to support this Motion because of five reasons. Number one, the way it is drafted. It is drafted in a very good way. It has teeth. Most of the Motions that I have been seeing here tend not to really have a very good remedy but this one has a very clear remedy, meaning once we pass this Motion, there are high chances that it will be implemented because of the way it is drafted. It has teeth. Number two, it is not of a selfish nature. Even us Members of Parliament ... view
• 9 Oct 2013 in National Assembly: On a point of order, hon. Deputy Speaker. view
• 3 Oct 2013 in National Assembly: Thank you, hon. Deputy Speaker, for giving me this chance. view
• 3 Oct 2013 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, every time I see a nomination for appointment in this House, I feel sorry for CORD Members. I have noted with a lot of humility that all the appointments have been coming from the Central region. I feel for them. I feel sorry for the people of the Coast region. In all the appointments that have been made, I have never seen a single person from the Coast region. I have never seen a person from Meru. I have never seen a person from Busia County. But God is good! This is the only time I ... view
• 3 Oct 2013 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, protect me from hon. Members. Let them, kindly; allow me to prosecute my argument. view
• 3 Oct 2013 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, just to reply to those points of order, first and foremost, the hon. Members who stood on points of order--- view
• 3 Oct 2013 in National Assembly: I am most obliged, hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker. view
• 3 Oct 2013 in National Assembly: The first argument by the Committee is that the procedure that was used was not the correct one. One may argue that maybe that is the correct position but the question is: Should that prejudice the candidates themselves? My argument is no. When you kill, it is you who is taken to the court. When you steal it is you who is taken to court but it is very unfair to visit that illegality on an innocent applicant. So, the point is these candidates did not commit any illegality. It is the panel which purportedly committed that illegality. It will ... view
• 3 Oct 2013 in National Assembly: Yes, hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker. Number two, there is the argument that people with special needs were not considered. There has been an opinion in the Supreme Court defining what is a right which should be implemented now and a right that should be implemented systematically. These are special interests, issues related to the youth and gender. The Supreme Court in its wisdom has held that you cannot implement that right immediately. It is something that is progressive. So, therefore, my argument is that that is something that can be implemented. view