All parliamentary appearances
Entries 2941 to 2950 of 4273.
-
3 May 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have no reason to believe that hon. Mbadi is not an honourable Member. I believe he should have expunged his conduct in the earlier debate before he spoke on this particular one. That is what good manners normally demand.
view
-
3 May 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, I was suggesting that he should have had a preamble to his presentation and said that. The last time the House made a mistake, he compounded it by voting in a particular way. But he just stood up and said that it is not in order.
view
-
3 May 2012 in National Assembly:
Let me proceed. Based on what the Constitution said on how we should interpret it, the only other reasonable interpretation to what is before is that it is important to live, not only the letter and spirit of this Constitution, but also allow this Motion to proceed and be debated fully.
view
-
26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 2 be amended by deleting the interpretation of “riparian reserve” and substituting therefor the following new interpretation- “riparian reserve” means land adjacent to the ocean, lake, sea, rivers, dams and water courses as provided under the Survey Act or any other written law.
view
-
26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly:
The justification is that that definition as appears in the Survey Act of Kenya---
view
-
26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, yesterday, Members were requiring justification. So, if there is no requirement for justification, then I move the amendment.
view
-
26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir.
view
-
26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly:
Was it an amendment or deletion so that the record is clear?
view
-
26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly:
Yes, Clause 9 is a deletion. It is not an amendment.
view
-
26 Apr 2012 in National Assembly:
In fact, I was saying so because he was justifying as if it was a new clause with some provision. But he was saying it was taken care of in another clause.
view