Tom Joseph Kajwang'

Parties & Coalitions

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 4171 to 4180 of 10308.

  • 26 May 2015 in National Assembly: All right, I hear you. If the issue is whether or not the Chair proposed the Question, I think you have answered yourself that the Chair proposed the Question. However, on the other issue as to whether the Chair should have allowed Members to contribute, it remains the discretion of the Chair. As you know, at that point we are agreeing to the Committee of the whole House. It is different from when we are retiring after the Third Reading when Members can give valedictory messages. So, this is at the discretion of the Chair to allow or not to ... view
  • 26 May 2015 in National Assembly: Proceed and do it conventionally. Lay the Paper on the Table. view
  • 26 May 2015 in National Assembly: The Paper is so laid. Let us move on to next Order! view
  • 26 May 2015 in National Assembly: Hon. Member for Mbeere South. view
  • 26 May 2015 in National Assembly: The Motion being now the property of the House, be scheduled at the appropriate time for debate in the Chamber. view
  • 26 May 2015 in National Assembly: Hon. Members, there being no other business, and the time being 5.43 p.m., this House stands adjourned until Wednesday, 27th May, 2015, at 9.30 a.m. view
  • 26 May 2015 in National Assembly: The House rose at 5.43 p.m. view
  • 26 May 2015 in National Assembly: The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
  • 30 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: Order, Hon. Bowen. You are the same people who vet and approve those people. If those people are thieves and corrupt as you say, how come the National Assembly approved the people who are appointed as cabinet secretaries? I am trying to follow your argument. view
  • 30 Apr 2015 in National Assembly: The point I am making Hon. Bowen is that you should say things which are consistent. When members of public are following your debate, they should find it consistent with your role. If somebody is a thief and he is appointed an ambassador, the public will ask how the National Assembly approved the name of that person if, indeed, he was a thief. So, what it boils to is: Are you doing your duty as a Member of the National Assembly? That is the point that you need to work on. Proceed and finish. view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus