Tom Joseph Kajwang'

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 5321 to 5330 of 10308.

• 17 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Well, you do not inform the Chair because there is nothing to inform him about. He just puts it to vote. Okay, Member for Ol Jorok, you are a studious Member of this Committee. Can you help us here? view
• 17 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: You do not seem to differ on appreciation of sub-clause 1. You seem to be arguing over whether the word “shall” should change to “may” or whether “may” should change to “shall”. That is why it is tied to appreciating Clause 11(2). Here, it means that if it is a child applying for this order of protection, then this child must follow Clause 11(2), whichever the situation. Even if there is no Children’s Officer, he must look for one somewhere. That is why it is permissive. Hon. Chairman, what did you have in mind? view
• 17 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: That clears the ambiguity because Clause 11(2) gives you several ways in which this child can approach the court by application. However, when you say “shall”, then this child must look for these ten solutions. Can I put the Question then? Member for Ndhiwa, have you changed your position? view
• 17 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Are you changing your position? You had supported the Chairperson. view
• 17 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Thank you very much, I appreciate. The only problem I see is that all of you seem to be agreed on sub-clause (1), is that right? view
• 17 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Let me just put the Question. view
• 17 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Well, we cannot have an argument on this, can we? Let us put it to vote and see how it goes. Let me propose them sub-clause by sub-clause. I can put (b) and (c) together, but let me put (a) separately because they relate to different things. view
• 17 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: The Chair is in doubt. If they shouted loudly, everyone has the right to shout. So, you need to shout as loud as you can. view
• 17 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Members, this is just to improve the drafting style. It seems to me that it retains everything subject to what you think. However, it is just to improve the drafting style. Member for Kibra, you do not want to speak to this, do you? Member for Seme, you want to speak to this? view
• 17 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Yes, Member for Narok. view