20 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Thank you, hon. Speaker for giving me a chance. I am going to oppose the amendment. As we stand here today Kenyans are watching us. If we want to do this, then let us amend Chapter Six of the Constitution. Let us pluck it off. If we pluck it off then we can sit here as Members who follow the rule of law and regulations and pass this name. I have nothing against Mututho. I have nothing against what he can do for this country, but the law is very clear. Members, this is how dictatorship comes; it comes when ...
view
20 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Thank you. I am going to the section where the person who was being interviewed told the panel not to use it and I am going to quote. He said:
view
20 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
“My humble request, therefore, is that you restrict the approval and not vetting within Section 6(2) of NACADA law and, perhaps, one day when I am lucky to get a constitutional office then Parliament can do the vetting under Chapter Six of the Constitution.” It is him who was saying, that if he was going to be vetted that section should not be used.
view
20 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Another point is that when the nominee was being interviewed he said this---
view
20 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Thank you, hon. Speaker, Sir. I would like to inform hon. Members that I am quoting the letter written by hon. Mututho and not me. This is the letter he gave to Parliament. If he said so, he knew that he was guilty. He said do not---
view
20 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Thank you, Hon. Speaker, Sir, for being kind to me.
view
20 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
He has said that he wants this matter to end on 20th November, which is today. Why can hon. Members not wait for him to get a ruling from a court - I am going by the Report of the Chairman – so that the President can submit his name if this matter is concluded and we give him the job? Somebody else can be given the job if hon. Mututho is convicted.
view
20 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Hon. Speaker, Sir, I oppose the amendment.
view
12 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I oppose the amendment. I agree with what daktari has said. What is happening here is this: In a matrimonial home, let the people contribute to the baking of the cake. If you allow only one person, The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor.
view
12 Nov 2013 in National Assembly:
somebody could come into marriage for one purpose; which is to share the property with you. Once the person is married, they become husband or wife and then they will claim: “Let us split the wealth on a “50-50 basis.” So, the best way is that we allow people to share wealth, but depending on the contribution each person has made towards the baking of the cake. I oppose. Property should not be distributed equally on a 50-50 basis.
view