Martha Karua

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 311 to 320 of 2953.

• 20 Jun 2012 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Chair, I have an amendment to the Tea Act but if the Minister says that he is deleting because my amendment was deleting, I will have no problem so I will let him come first. view
• 20 Jun 2012 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady. view
• 20 Jun 2012 in National Assembly: I would like to seek to be given time to move my amendment on the Sugar Act before the deletion by the Attorney General - whatever wishes to delete. view
• 20 Jun 2012 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady, my amendment is on page 3672 and it relates to Section 31 of the Sugar Act. view
• 20 Jun 2012 in National Assembly: I am also on a point of order. My colleagues cannot anticipate. I have not even said what I am moving. view
• 20 Jun 2012 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I have an amendment to the Sugar Act and the deletion will affect the amendment. I want to state on this point of order what the amendment says so that the Chair can give a ruling. view
• 20 Jun 2012 in National Assembly: I am introducing a Section 3(A) to the Sugar Act. It is a new Section. I am suggesting that the judgement of a Sugar Tribunal be executed. It should be filed in the High Court and executed as a judgement of the Court. Even though the Minister is moving and he is going to bring a comprehensive Act, it is a very terrible situation that all the sugar farmers cannot execute judgement against the sugar company and they have lots of judgements. So, I am asking the Attorney General to let this go on because asking the sugar farmers to ... view
• 20 Jun 2012 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I want to seek your guidance. Is it possible even if he deletes it to introduce the section 3(a) based on his earlier proposal? I have no issues with the sections he is deleting because mine is a new introduction. Is it possible to debate it after his deletion? view
• 20 Jun 2012 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I want to agree with hon. Jamleck Kamau, but oppose Dr. Khalwale’s amendment. view
• 20 Jun 2012 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Chairlady, the reason this House should support the amendment by the Attorney General as it is, is that already we have sufficient laws. Anybody who gives false information in court is charged with an offence called perjury. Whether you accused somebody of murder, rape, defilement or any other offence, you will be guilty of perjury. If you lie to a police officer to cause them to act against any other person, you are also guilty of giving false information to a police officer. Section 38 of the Section Offences Act, as it stands today, is unconstitutional. It ... view