Eng Mohammed Maalim Mahamud

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 2111 to 2120 of 2205.

• 18 Feb 2009 in National Assembly: Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Sir. With regard to KPC, a decision was made in May, 2005, by the Government, which owned the Kipevu Oil Storage Facility (KOSF) to adjust the storage tariff charged from US$2 to US$3 per cubic litre. That enhanced tariff was made to address the increased operational costs and the cost of additional storage facility constructed at KOSF. view
• 18 Feb 2009 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, for the oil refinery, the fee was raised from US$0.4 per barrel to US$2.5 per barrel of crude oil processed. That upgrade improved the ullage allocation to all oil companies. view
• 18 Feb 2009 in National Assembly: Those enhanced tariffs were communicated to all oil companies who have since complied, except for Kenol/Kobil Group of Companies. view
• 18 Feb 2009 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I now wish to respond to the specific issues raised by hon. C. Kilonzo. view
• 18 Feb 2009 in National Assembly: (a) As mentioned in the introduction, the Government does not award contracts to oil view
• 18 Feb 2009 in National Assembly: 5072 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES February 18, 2009 view
• 18 Feb 2009 in National Assembly: companies for importation of crude and refined oils. What the Government does is to oversee the Open Tendering System (OTS) by inviting all kinds of bids which are then evaluated in the presence of all participating oil companies. view
• 18 Feb 2009 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, in tandem with the OTS rules, the Ministry of Energy informs all oil marketing companies of the winners of tenders who then are required to import the tendered quantities. It is through the OTS process that Kenol/Kobil Group of Companies have continued to participate and win many tenders for processing by KPR Ltd. view
• 18 Feb 2009 in National Assembly: (b) Mr. Speaker, Sir, with respect to non-payment of required fees, when the dispute arose, the Ministry of Energy decided to exclude Kenol/Kobil Group of Companies from participating in the tender as it was considered unfair for them to continue importing crude oil for domestic processing without paying the required processing fees. Kenol/Kobil moved to court and obtained an injunction to maintain the status quo. Kenol/Kobil Group of Companies currently owes KPRL Kshs497 million. view
• 18 Feb 2009 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, with regard to KPC, the relationship between the company and the oil companies is governed by a transport and storage agreement signed and executed between the company and all individual oil marketing companies. The current version of the agreement became operational in 2006 and was signed by all oil companies with the exception of, again, Kenol/Kobil Group of Companies. Instead, Kenol/Kobil Group of Companies sued and obtained an injunction against the company again. view