15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I will maintain what I have said that a letter was received by the Senate. It is for the Chair and the House to interpret whether it is due service. However, allow me to finalise my argument and then you will guide.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me to make my case then probably you will rule after that. May I proceed?
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
I cannot confirm that.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
All I can confirm is that I have tabled a letter here by M/S Havi and Company Advocates that was received by the Senate.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
I am not arguing that it is a court order. In the same manner in which you requested me to table it, I am just describing what I have tabled.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have just tabled the letter and you have not scrutinized it, how then would you know what I have tabled?
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, allow me then to conclude my submission.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. I am glad that you have reaffirmed that I am entitled to my opinion just as everyone else is entitled to their various opinions whether we agree with them or not. The point I am trying to make is looking at the dates when we received the communication from the county assembly to today, we have acknowledged that the Senate has received a letter of a certain nature. However, it might not be a court order or what satisfies your thinking. Prudence demands that once the Senate starts a process, which we have agreed ...
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am contributing to the Motion.
view
15 Oct 2019 in Senate:
Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I started by saying that I oppose the Motion. I am giving reasons why I oppose it.
view