Otieno Kajwang

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 281 to 290 of 1172.

• 23 Jul 2013 in Senate: I do not know what he said! view
• 23 Jul 2013 in Senate: Because, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, what is it that he said? What was his point of order? I did not even notice. But the fact that I am speaking here does not mean--- view
• 23 Jul 2013 in Senate: Is there another one? view
• 23 Jul 2013 in Senate: Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. First, I think Sen. Haji suggested--- view
• 23 Jul 2013 in Senate: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am not sure whether I should respond to that one unless you say it is a point of order, but I do not think it is. I am seriously on my feet and I am saying that the signature that was put on the Division of Revenue Bill is the reason why we are in court. It is a serious matter for this nation and for this House. It decides whether this House is relevant or not and whether you sit here or not. Let me proceed with my debate. view
• 23 Jul 2013 in Senate: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, next time I will ask you to ask hon. Senators to raise the matter that is out of order before you allow them to use the microphone. view
• 23 Jul 2013 in Senate: I suppose I am not being bullied in this House. view
• 23 Jul 2013 in Senate: I think the Chair knows and could have made a ruling himself. What has just been said by the first speaker about Nairobi managing 65 per cent of the economy of this country, leave alone the revenue generated, should not be considered to be a passing matter. We love Nairobi; in fact, we want it to grow even more but if you went to other countries that have developed, you will find that in every city, there is something going on. If you go to Germany, Berlin is not necessarily the largest city but there is something going on in ... view
• 23 Jul 2013 in Senate: Kwale is better because there are industries. It is difficult to debate this Bill without feeling demeaned. It is difficult to debate this Bill to distribute Kshs210 billion without feeling as if we have been taken for granted as the House which should have determined, defended and promoted devolution. Without saying more, I suggest that the next time this Bill comes, the Constitution should be clear. It should say that the Division of Revenue Bill is the business of the Senate. If it says so, even if there is no concurrence with the other House, then we will have business ... view
• 23 Jul 2013 in Senate: No, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. view