Otieno Kajwang

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 811 to 820 of 1172.

• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: (ii) The applicant must produce proof of citizenship and age; view
• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: (iii) The vetting process should be done in one sitting; (iv) The applicant must have been born in the district where vetting is taking place; or the applicant hails from a border district and is applying elsewhere. (v)The applicant must be identified as a Kenyan by at least one of the elders who must vouch this by filing or appending his left thumb print on the form and he will include his name and identity card on the registration form. view
• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: (vi) Vetting proceedings are captured in form of minutes which must accompany the application from of the applicant to the headquarters for processing. view
• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: These requirements apply to all designated border districts in the country and some urban areas like Nairobi, Mombasa and Thika. view
• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I want to apologise that I did not give the names from each location. However, the names are here. We have 9,497 names of those who were issued with identity cards. You can go through the gymnastics of checking. Below the list, there are the 1,098 applications that were rejected. I think I have now answered that question. view
• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I should be available tomorrow afternoon, only that we deal with applications and I have said that they were 12,000--- view
• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I undertake to inform the Minister so that he can respond sometime next week after doing some serious consultations. view
• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Yes, Mr. Speaker, Sir. view
• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, the Ministerial Statement will be issued on Tuesday afternoon. view
• 9 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I rise on a very fine point of order. I thought that there was a report about that cemetery land, which was done by a Committee of this House. The Report was tabled in this House and, therefore, it is the property of the House. Listening to the substance of the Ministerial Statement that has been sought, it seems like it is on the Report which is about to be debated. So, can we allow this House to debate the Report first, so that we know what it is all about? If there is any supplementary ... view