Paul Otiende Amollo

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 61 to 70 of 660.

• 6 Apr 2022 in National Assembly: The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 31 Mar 2022 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Speaker. The Supreme Court decision excites a number of Members, especially those who do not understand the law like Hon. Sankok. view
• 31 Mar 2022 in National Assembly: Allow me to inform Hon. Sankok that, contrary to his celebration, he should be mourning. Out of seven fundamental points, the Supreme Court allowed five grounds. view
• 31 Mar 2022 in National Assembly: The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 31 Mar 2022 in National Assembly: The fundamental importance is that it has set the stage for reggae to resume immediately after the elections. Thank you. view
• 8 Feb 2022 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Speaker. I support the spirit and context of the Petition, not necessarily the conclusion. I think the conclusion is what the Committee must examine. While it is a good a thing to have more bodies regulate the environment, it is also true that some of the bodies we have had including NEMA, have tended to focus more on development rather than the environment generally. They have tended to focus on who is doing development, the licenses to be given to them rather than on essential issues of environment including the ten per cent tree cover. What are ... view
• 5 Jan 2022 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. This proposal by Hon. Rasso must fall for the same reason the proposal by Hon. Didmus Barasa fell. But, it is even more serious. He proposes deletion of subsection (1) and leaves subsection (2) to sit. Subsection (1) is the substantive section. Subsections 2 to 6 are the procedure. You cannot delete the substantive part and wish to leave the rest. It is illogical. These proposals aim to bring political hygiene. view
• 5 Jan 2022 in National Assembly: I oppose, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. view
• 5 Jan 2022 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I oppose that proposal for a very direct reason. Clause 1 is merely restricted to describing the legislation we are dealing with. The question of commencement, if it was to be considered, is a substantive question. It would not come under the Title. It would come under a substantive path that would seek to basically vary what is in the Constitution and what is in the law. view
• 5 Jan 2022 in National Assembly: There are statements that have been made by five Members on constitutionality. We should not let this go because it might be supposed that we accept … view