Prof. Anyang' Nyong'o

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 1901 to 1910 of 2249.

• 15 Jan 2008 in National Assembly: 26 PARLIAMENTARYL DEBATES January 15, 2007 view
• 15 Jan 2008 in National Assembly: Mr. Musyoka has said that we should respect traditions. The anxiety on this side is that His Excellency, the former President, has not been very good at respecting traditions. view
• 15 Jan 2008 in National Assembly: We had a tradition in this House since 1997 of appointing members according to 1997 Inter- Parties Parliamentary Group (IPPG) agreement, which was a tradition. But rather than respect traditions, the President went to law rather than tradition. So, the argument that we should respect tradition has rarely been observed by the other side, let alone the Presidency. So, it is very difficult for the other side to argue that we should respect tradition and on that basis make a decision today. view
• 15 Jan 2008 in National Assembly: Swearing-in is a very important event. It is like being baptised. If you are an Anglican and you are baptised according to the Roman Catholic procedures, your baptism may not actually be valid. Since we are going to swear allegiance as hon. Members of Parliament, I want to admit that, that swearing-in must be properly done. So, the point raised by Mr. James Orengo is extremely important. We would like to get a clear ruling from the Chair or the Attorney-General, given the valid point that hon. Orengo has raised. view
• 15 Jan 2008 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, is it really valid for us to swear-in on a wrong premise or wait until that is clarified, so that we are properly baptised and not according to the catechism of procedures of a church we do not belong to? view
• 16 Oct 2007 in National Assembly: That is not true! view
• 16 Oct 2007 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. view
• 16 Oct 2007 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. view
• 3 Oct 2007 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, the Motion talks about inequitable and unstructured distribution of loans as managed by the Higher Education Loans Board (HELB). Whereas I support the spirit of the Motion, I am wondering whether the solution provided is real. Whether you are going to deal with the issue of inequitable distribution or unstructured ways in which the HELB handles the Fund, by devolving it to constituencies, I had rather thought that HELB would run this system from all higher education institutions so that in every higher education institution, and not just universities, we have a department that deals ... view
• 3 Oct 2007 in National Assembly: That is for the Mover. I am contributing to the Motion. That would be at the discretion of the Mover. I am not amending it. view