27 Jun 2012 in National Assembly:
I am inserting it after (c).
view
27 Jun 2012 in National Assembly:
So, we want to delete 185(2)(a) which should be (3)(a). I also wish to bring to the notice of the Committee Members of another amendment that had been agreed upon, but again, I have just noticed that it is missing from here. This was on 185(3). It should have read:- “That Clause 185(3) be amended by striking out the words “the county treasury shall make a copy of the report” and replacing it with “copies of the reports prepared in sub-section (2) and (3) shall be submitted to read as follows:- “185(3): Copies of the report prepared in sub-section (2) ...
view
27 Jun 2012 in National Assembly:
The new 185(3); yes.
view
27 Jun 2012 in National Assembly:
Yes, Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir.
view
27 Jun 2012 in National Assembly:
No, no; I am saying that after Clause 185(c)---
view
27 Jun 2012 in National Assembly:
Yes, 185(3).
view
27 Jun 2012 in National Assembly:
The amended one now after 185(3). Now it should read:- “Copies of the report prepared in section (2) and (3) shall be submitted to the Controller of Budget, the Commission on Revenue Allocation and the Auditor-General.”
view
27 Jun 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, for the sake of good order and also consistency, instead of “government-linked corporation”, we should say “state corporation” as we had done. So, I am proposing that we amend “state-linked corporation” to “State Corporation.”
view
27 Jun 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I think there is a problem here, because you cannot have a county state-linked corporation.
view
27 Jun 2012 in National Assembly:
Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I agree with what Ms. Karua has said. It will now read; “county corporations” or “county linked companies.” We were trying to make sure that when we say “Government”, we know that we mean “county”.
view