Robinson Njeru Githae

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 2621 to 2630 of 2672.

• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, you have proposed that Clause 6(c) and (d) be part of the Bill, which are, in fact, enumerated by the same paragraph, which reads:- "By renumbering the paragraphs appearing immediately after sub-paragraphs (b) (iii) as paragraphs (c) and (d);" This is what we are talking about. Sections (c) and (d) are also mentioned in the same clause. He has not yet moved the renumbered Clause 6(c) and (d). view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, we have not dealt with the renumbered Clause 6(c) and (d). What you have said is correct because Clause 6(b) refers to three sections, but after renumbering, we have not dealt with the renumbered sections (c) and (d). The purpose of this amendment was to renumber the various sections because we do not have (c) and (d) in the Bill. view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, as I said, the Mover did not move the entire Clause 6. He has been moving it in parts. He only moved Clause 6(a) and (b). view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, the Mover did not mention subclauses (c) and (d). So, we were only discussing Clause 6 (a) and (b). I said that the mistake that happened is that he moved it in bits and pieces. If we do not deal with subclauses (c) and (d) then the amendments in subclauses (a) and (b) will contradict each other because in one area we are removing certain bodies from being in the board and then in the other area we are saying we can reappoint. It will be a total contradiction. view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, it is not that the rules do not allow us. It is because we have not dealt with the whole clause. We have only dealt with Clause 6 (a) and (b). view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, it is now very clear that the Mover has moved the whole clause and not bits and pieces as happened to the other one and so we will respond to the whole Clause. We have no problem with the proposed amendment in subclause (a) but for the subclause (b), we want to delete the words after "appointment" in the third line so that it reads: "By deleting the full-stop appearing after the word "appointment" in the fourth line and inserting the words "but shall be eligible for re-appointment" and we stop it there so that ... view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I am proposing a further amendment to Clause 11(b). view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, as I said, we have no objection to Clause 11(a) as amended, but on Clause 11(b), I would like to move a further amendment as follows:- THAT, Clause 11(b) be further amended to read as follows:- (b) deleting the full-stop appearing after the word "appointment" in the fourth line and inserting the words, "but shall be eligible for re-appointment." The other words, "for a second but last term on the recommendation of the Board" immediately after the word "appointment" should be deleted. view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Yes, Mr. Temporary Deputy July 6, 2006 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES 1913 Chairman, Sir. Mr. Moi, do you have anything to say on that further amendment? view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I appreciate the concerns the Committee had to propose this amendment. However, our view is that trying to put audit trails, business plans and correspondence in a Bill of Parliament is not right. If we want to amend the business plan and correspondence we have to re-visit this Bill in future. Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I am proposing that we should delete this clause so that the business plans, correspondence and audit trails will be in the business charter of the organisation rather than putting it here. We have never come across audit plans ... view