Samuel Kiprono Chepkonga

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 1871 to 1880 of 3315.

• 19 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: THAT, Clause 21 of the Bill be amended— (a) in subclause (2) by deleting the word “follow” appearing in paragraph (b) and substituting therefor the word “stalk”; (b) in subclause (7) by deleting the word “modified” appearing immediately after the words “revoked or” in paragraph (b) and substituting therefor the word “varied”; (c) by deleting subclause (8); (d) by deleting subclause (9); view
• 19 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: We are replacing the word “follow” with the word “stalk”. It cannot be illegal to follow someone. However, to do it in a negative manner, that is what is illegal. view
• 19 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Secondly, we have also replaced the word “modified” with the word “varied”. Again, the word “varied” has been used consistently in the Bill. We do not know why the word “modified” was introduced yet “varied” is explained and interpreted in the Bill. view
• 19 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: I propose also that Clause 21(d) be dropped. I am dropping amendment of Clause 21(d). Thank you, hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. view
• 19 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, just for clarity sake, I am proposing that Clause 21 be amended in subclause 2 by replacing the word “follow” with “stalk”. Secondly, I propose that subclause 7 be amended by deleting the word “modified” and replace therefor with the word “varied”. We are also proposing that subclause 8 of Clause 21 be deleted. The reason is that the word “modified” as interpreted thereon is being removed because it does not make sense. What is contained in Clause 21(7) is the interpretation of the word “varied”. view
• 19 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: I am proposing also that subclause 9 of Clause 21, as proposed for deletion and as contained in the Order Paper be dropped. I am, therefore, proposing that we drop the amendment proposed of Clause 21(d). view
• 19 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Just a final clarification, hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. The word we are replacing is “modified” as contained in the clause. We are doing that because the word “varied” has been used consistently in the Bill. So, it was a misnomer to have it there. It does not make sense to contain the word “modified”. You vary a court order, you do not modify it. That is the language of the court. It is not a modification, rather it is a variation. If you apply to court, you apply for variation--- view
• 19 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 22 of the Bill be amended by deleting subclause (5); The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 19 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: As I stated, we have reviewed our notes and found that Clause 22 (5) was not proposed to be amended and so I drop that particular amendment. view
• 19 Mar 2015 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, the Bill be amended by deleting Clause 23. I am being asked where these amendments came from. Possibly we need to explain. view