Samuel Kiprono Chepkonga

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 971 to 980 of 3315.

• 17 Nov 2015 in National Assembly: This is a small amendment. We are seeking to remove unnecessary provisions that exclude corporate bodies or non-corporate bodies from instituting suits in the Small Claims Court. view
• 17 Nov 2015 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 18 of the Bill be amended in subclause (2) by inserting the word “mechanism” immediately after the word “resolution”. view
• 17 Nov 2015 in National Assembly: We are seeking to insert the word “mechanism” that was missing immediately after the word “resolution”. view
• 17 Nov 2015 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 21 of the Bill be amended by deleting subclause (3). view
• 17 Nov 2015 in National Assembly: The import of this is to remove a provision that was allowing parties to choose their own interpreters. It is very dangerous to allow a litigant to come with his or her own interpreter. That means that the interpreter will be choosing how to translate that which fits into their suit. There are normal procedures for obtaining an interpreter who is independent of the litigants according to the court rules. view
• 17 Nov 2015 in National Assembly: The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 17 Nov 2015 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 23 of the Bill be amended in subclause (2) by deleting the word “the” appearing immediately after the words “prejudice to”. view
• 17 Nov 2015 in National Assembly: This is to remove unnecessary words contained in that clause. view
• 17 Nov 2015 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I have a further amendment to this clause. view
• 17 Nov 2015 in National Assembly: I beg to move:- THAT, clause 26 of the Bill be amended— (a) in sub-clause (3) by deleting the word “had” appearing immediately after the words “on the claim” and substituting therefor the word “has”; (b) in sub-clause (5) by deleting the expression “, (3) or (4)” appearing immediately after the expression “(1), (2)” and substituting therefor the expression “or (3)”. We are seeking to correct grammatical errors contained in that Clause which is using past tense instead of present tense. We are also seeking to correct references to sub-clauses within the Clause itself. view