Prof. Samuel Poghisio

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 1611 to 1620 of 3241.

• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I thought that the Minister had indicated that he would not be able to answer the Question today. However, now that he is not here the Question can be deferred to another day and I will pass the information to him. view
• 23 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I request for a second chance and see if that can be disproved. view
• 3 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Madam Temporary Deputy Speaker. Is the hon. Member in order to imply that Ministers are “so-called” and that they are corrupt without any substantive Motion coming to the House about any of these people? I am a Minister and I can stand the test that he is talking about. view
• 3 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Madam Temporary Deputy Speaker. Parliamentary language does not allow the hon. Member to call Ministers “so-called Ministers” and impute improper motive on Members of Parliament. view
• 3 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Madam Temporary Deputy Speaker. view
• 3 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Speaker, our Standing Orders clearly indicate that you cannot talk about Members of Parliament without bringing a substantive Motion. view
• 3 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Without actually substantiating them? view
• 3 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Madam Temporary Deputy Speaker, thank you very much for giving me this opportunity to contribute to the Presidential Speech. view
• 3 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: From the onset, I would like to say that this is basically the House recording its thanks for the exposition of public policy contained in His Excellency the President’s Speech. The sooner hon. Members realise that this is not about the character of the President, the better. It has nothing to do with splitting hairs on the individual words that come out of it. It is actually the exposition of public policy. I wish hon. Members could focus on the public policy contained in the President’s Speech, rather than splitting hairs about what he said individually. view
• 3 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: I hope it can be said clearly from the Chair that Cabinet Ministers cannot speak from the Opposition’s point of view. It is very disheartening to see a Minister attacking his appointing authority from the Floor of the House. That also means that there might be further “coalition wars” being brought to the Floor of this House. That is not what we should be encouraging. We should not encourage “coalition wars” to be extended to this House. I was about to confront a colleague in the House. It is not very good for me to confront a colleague because I ... view