20 Jul 2006 in National Assembly:
Mr. Attorney-General, I think you are complicating the situation because you are here and you were the Mover. You can actually reply because you are here.
view
20 Jul 2006 in National Assembly:
Order, Mr. Wako! Do you know that you have the right to reply until you finish doing so? There is no interruption in your reply!
view
20 Jul 2006 in National Assembly:
Well, that is your right as the Government side. My worry was that the Attorney-General was beginning to debate. Once you make the move and proceed to talk about it, then you are actually taking the time allocated for replying. We cannot have the two of you replying at the same time. The only thing you can do is to appoint somebody to make a reply and then continue to add on whatever you are saying. In your case, because you have been requested to reply, you can continue until you finish. That is absolutely your right. So, you may ...
view
20 Jul 2006 in National Assembly:
Hon. Members, it is now time for the interruption of business. This House, therefore, stands adjourned until Tuesday, 25th July, 2006, at 2.30 p.m. The House rose at 6.30 p.m.
view
19 Jul 2006 in National Assembly:
Mr. Kajwang, proceed!
view
19 Jul 2006 in National Assembly:
Mr. Minister, let me interrupt you by advising that since I had already given a chance to another hon. Member to speak, you will get your chance and move your amendment.
view
19 Jul 2006 in National Assembly:
The Motion still exists as it is. It has not been amended.
view
19 Jul 2006 in National Assembly:
Mr. Shitanda, you are moving an 2180 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES July 19, 2006 amendment! Just move it straightaway as it is!
view
19 Jul 2006 in National Assembly:
Order! I am constrained for time and I think you had better finish up because I would like to give this time to the Official Government Responder. So, you should wind up.
view
19 Jul 2006 in National Assembly:
I now call upon the Government Official Responder.
view