Parties & Coalitions

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 1051 to 1060 of 1853.

  • 31 Oct 2023 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I thank you for that protection. By the time the matter is brought to us, it is an indication of a failure of leadership in Meru County. We are here to deal with the problems you should have sorted out at home. view
  • 31 Oct 2023 in Senate: ( Loud consultations) view
  • 31 Oct 2023 in Senate: Let me conclude by saying that, that is the work of the Senate. It is the constitutional mandate of Senate. view
  • 31 Oct 2023 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, the jab has already landed. I can see it is working. I withdraw the jab. I beg the House that we go the route of a Committee that will enable us to interrogate the facts and interview witnesses. Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale will bear me witness that the last time we were in this similar committee, the witnesses would take oath there and you would subject them to cross- examination. The people who have experience with Plenary, such as Sen. Olekina - unless he was misleading me - has told me of a different story when it comes ... view
  • 31 Oct 2023 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, with those many remarks, I second this Motion and hope that our colleagues will adopt the same and proceed in that particular fashion. I thank you. view
  • 31 Oct 2023 in Senate: Throw him out. view
  • 31 Oct 2023 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I believe that this would fall under the ambit of anticipating debate. This is because what our colleague Senator is saying is that there is a desired result. If you go the same way, you will get the same results as the last time and that result was not desirable. Mr. Speaker, Sir, in accordance with your guidance, nobody should anticipate what result would arise from what process. That is what you guided us to do. So, he should refrain in his debate from suggesting that somehow--- The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for ... view
  • 31 Oct 2023 in Senate: By the way, there is no such thing as a second impeachment acting as an appeal. I have not read the facts and the allegations, but they are based on new facts and new allegations. They are being treated as a new case to be examined objectively based on the facts and evidence. So, he is out of order. I would wish that you would rule on that particular objection. view
  • 31 Oct 2023 in Senate: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. view
  • 31 Oct 2023 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, with your kind permission under Standing Order No. 109, I would now like to propose that we call the Mover to reply. view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus