Adan Keynan

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 651 to 660 of 2430.

• 17 Aug 2016 in National Assembly: Ms. Catherine Namuye should be investigated, charged and prosecuted for violating Section72(1) of the Public Finance Management Act which requires that Accounting Officers of national Government entity be responsible for the management of the entities’ assets and liabilities. Again, Ms. Catherine Namuye failed to discharge her functions as an Accounting Officer in ensuring that the tax payers’ money was protected. Therefore, she should also be investigated, charged and prosecuted for violating provisions of Section 68(1)(a)(b) of the PFM Act that stipulates that an Accounting Officer should ensure public resources are utilised in a legal, authorised and effective way to ensure ... view
• 17 Aug 2016 in National Assembly: Ms. Catherine Namuye should be investigated, charged and prosecuted for violating Section 15 of the Public Officer Ethics Act that requires that an officer should take responsibility to take steps to ensure that the property that is entrusted under her authority is adequately protected and not misused. view
• 17 Aug 2016 in National Assembly: Ms. Catherine Namuye should also be investigated, charged and prosecuted for various acts of omission and commission with the intention to defraud the Fund. view
• 17 Aug 2016 in National Assembly: Ms. Catherine Namuye should also be investigated for her role in the cancellation of the YEDF anniversary event. Again, you realise that these people authorised for particular events to take place and after payment is made, they cancel the events and somebody gets payment for a service that has not been rendered. This is something that eventually made the YEDF to loss Kshs44,741,603 in one transaction for a service or function that was not rendered. They just organised an event and cancelled it in the last minute. The individuals were paid and eventually nobody talked about it. This was a ... view
• 17 Aug 2016 in National Assembly: Ms. Catherine Namuye should be investigated, charged and prosecuted for forgery under the Penal Code of 1990 Cap. 63 of the Laws of Kenya. She tampered with the board minutes to suit her weird business transaction. Therefore, she should also be taken to court. If found culpable, she should be completely barred from holding a public office pursuant to the provisions of Article 75(3) as read with Article 80(c) of the Constitution that stipulates that a person who is dismissed for compromising any public or official interest in favour of personal interest shall be disqualified from holding any public office. view
• 17 Aug 2016 in National Assembly: The other person of interest is Mr. Bruce Dominic Odhiambo. This person, I am sure you must have heard of him, is a joker. We even wonder how he ended up being the chair of the YEDF. view
• 17 Aug 2016 in National Assembly: From our interaction with this particular person, he did not know that he was not the Accounting Officer and not an executive chairman. Whatever he did, to the best of his view
• 17 Aug 2016 in National Assembly: The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 17 Aug 2016 in National Assembly: recollection, he would say that “as a chairman, I was entitled to an executive car, as a chairman, I was entitled to this or that”. Literally, the guy did not know his core mandate was just to chair board meeting. Slowly, he turned himself to an Accounting Officer. This is what led to the serious financial mismanagement at the YEDF. The Chairman, Mr. Bruce Odhiambo, should also be investigated, charged and prosecuted for violating the provisions of Section 15 of the Public Officer Ethics Act. He personally selected like-minded officers at the Enterprise. The board was not given all the ... view
• 17 Aug 2016 in National Assembly: Sixthly, Mr. Mukuria Ngamau should be investigated, charged and prosecuted for several suspicious cash withdrawals and cheques encashment. The bank should have been suspicious of an account that was opened, remained dormant and out of the blues, there was a huge transaction. You again realise that the same account witnessed serious cash withdrawals, but the bank does not even raise the issue. That led us to a conclusion that there must have been a conspiracy. There must be other individuals that did not appear before the Committee that were view