Alex Muthengi Mburi Mwiru

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 91 to 100 of 1067.

• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move:- THAT, clause 50 of the Bill be amended in the proposed new subsection (2), by deleting the word “alienation” appearing in paragraph (a) and substituting therefor the word “allocation”. The amendment is for the purpose of correcting the wording as public land is converted to private land by allocation. The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I would have wished to agree with him, but I wish he had read what the Committee is trying to propose. What is in the Order Paper is that we are giving the mandate as a Committee to the NLC in terms of allocation. So, if we delete the whole clause, we will defeat the purpose of the whole thing. I wish Hon. Kamoti could read what is proposed by the Committee in the Order Paper to realise that we are also looking at that angle. When we delete the whole clause, the whole morphology of ... view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I oppose that amendment. He has referred to the Land Control Act (Cap. 302) which has already been repealed to begin with. Some of his proposals and fears are taken care of in the Committee’s amendment. The issue is the definition of the term “controlled land”. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 53 of the Bill be amended in the proposed new section 12A− (a) in subsection (1)− (i) by deleting paragraph (c) in the definition of “controlled land”; (ii) by deleting paragraph (d) in the definition of “controlled land; (iii) by deleting paragraph (e) in the definition of “controlled land; (iv) by deleting paragraph (iii) in the definition of “ineligible person” and substituting therefor the following new paragraph− “(iii) a body corporate which has non-citizens as shareholders shall be deemed to be a non-citizen.” (b) by deleting subsection (2) and substituting ... view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: The reason is that we are trying to unlock agricultural land and public land from the definition of “controlled land” which Hon. Mwadime was trying to insinuate. The other reason is that we do not require Sub-section 3 because Sub-section 2 caters for all the transactions listed under Sub-section 3. Therefore, we are deleting Sub-section 3 because Sub-section 2 has taken care of that. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 54 of the Bill be amended- (a) in paragraph (a), by deleting the proposed new subsection (1) and substituting therefor the following new subsection− “(1) Before the expiry of the leasehold tenure, the Commission shall− (a) within five years, notify the lessee, by registered mail, of the date of expiry of the lease and inform the lessee of his or her pre-emptive right to allocation of the land upon application, provided that such lessee is a Kenyan citizen and that the land is not required by the national or county ... view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: The amendment will ensure that the lessee is notified in good time for his pre-emptive right to allocation of land. We are talking of when the lease is about to expire. We are saying that the lessee must be informed five years earlier and one year earlier again for the purposes of allowing the pre-emptive rights for the renewal of the lease. The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I oppose the amendment because whenever a person is deceased, the administrators have already been identified through the administration of the estate process. They would be the owners at that particular time. It may not add any value at the end the day. view
• 5 May 2016 in National Assembly: I oppose. view