Alex Muthengi Mburi Mwiru

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 241 to 250 of 1067.

• 4 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I oppose Hon. Mlolwa’s amendment because the Supreme Court has already advised on the functions of the National Land Commission (NLC) and the Ministry of Land, Housing and Urban Development. We do not need to go back to the conflict between the two entities so that we have to define their specific functions every time. view
• 4 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, there were quite a number of consultations going on around here and I could not hear his last justification. I really want to know whether I can carry his amendment or not. view
• 4 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 27 of the Bill be amended by deleting paragraph (a) and substituting therefor the following new paragraph— “(a) by deleting subsection (4) and substituting therefor the following new subsection− “(4) The Registrar shall not register a charge, unless a land rent clearance certificate, certifying that no rent is owing in respect of the land, and the consent to charge has been presented, or unless the land is freehold.” view
• 4 May 2016 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. The essence of this proposed amendment is to clearly set out conditions and structures for registering a charge. So, the root and the way we are supposed to register a charge is what we are trying to indicate here or put in a clearer way. view
• 4 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I oppose profusely. Hon. Mlolwa has explained that we are doing politics. I am doing legislation and I am doing it for the posterity of the country. So, I have not found any reason at all that justifies the deletion of the clause. Indeed, the purpose of amending the National Land Commission Act, the National Registration Act and the Land Act, is informed by issues to do with functions or matters to do with the administration of land. They have to be very clear. That is what we are trying to do as a Parliament today, ... view
• 4 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 32 of the Bill be amended− (a) in paragraph (b), by inserting the following proviso at the end of the proposed new Subsection (2)(b)− “Provided that a written notice of ninety days shall be given to the proprietor of such intention to make the alteration”; (b) in paragraph (c), by deleting the words “deleting subsection (3) and substituting therefor the following subsection” appearing in the introductory statement and substituting therefor the words “inserting the following new subsection immediately after subsection (3)”; (c) by deleting paragraph (d) and substituting therefor the ... view
• 4 May 2016 in National Assembly: without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, the regulations may provide for−” The purpose of the amendment is to seek and afford the proprietor of the land adequate notice of alteration. So, if there is supposed to be any alteration, the proprietor must be notified in good time and given ample time to know what the alternation is for. view
• 4 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 35 of the Bill be amended in paragraph (d) by deleting the proposed new subsection (8) and substituting therefor the following new subsection− The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 4 May 2016 in National Assembly: “(8) The Registrar may upon receipt of adequate proof dispense with the consent under subsection (6) if the Registrar considers that the consent cannot be obtained or is being withheld unreasonably and the Registrar shall note on the register and on the instrument the reasons for dispensing with the consent” It is a matter of correcting some grammatical error. So, there is no much to worry about it. view
• 4 May 2016 in National Assembly: Hon Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move:- THAT, Clause 36 of the Bill be deleted and replaced by the following new clause− Amendment of 36. Section 92 of the Land Registration Act is amended by section 92 of No. 3 inserting the words “provided that a designated co-tenant of 2012. shall be provided with the original title to the land. The gist of this is that it is not practical to have several regional certificate of titles issued to each co-tenant. In terms of this amendment then, one co-tenant will be issued with the original certificate of title while ... view