Asman Kamama

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 1981 to 1990 of 2457.

• 27 Oct 2010 in National Assembly: (ii) Chrisca Real Estates; and, view
• 27 Oct 2010 in National Assembly: (iii) The Ministry of Lands. The transaction was done within the legal procedures and, therefore, no action can be preferred by the Minister against the university’s management personnel who were involved in the transactions. Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, in addition to the answer, I wish to table the following documents:- (i) Permanent Secretary’s letter of authority for the Executive Committee of the University Council to manage the university until a Council is approved; (ii) council meeting minutes approving purchase of the property; (iii) minutes of Tender Committee meeting held on 21st May, 2010; (iv) sale agreement between the vendor and ... view
• 27 Oct 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I have also made sure that the hon. Member is aware of the contents of these documents. view
• 27 Oct 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, on the first question, I have tabled document number five on the instructions from the vendor’s advocate for direct remittance of the final payment to the vendor’s account. So, this was an agreement between the two lawyers, and it was within the legal beacons. view
• 27 Oct 2010 in National Assembly: On the last question, I am not aware that the lawyer’s fee precipitated an increase of the price of the property by 10 per cent, unless he has a document to prove his allegation. We also want to know whether there was corruption in this issue. view
• 27 Oct 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, to the best of our knowledge, as a Ministry, unless the hon. Member has any information, all the fees and everything was settled by the two lawyers, and the university was in agreement with whatever was paid. So, if the hon. Member has any other information, he may table it. view
• 27 Oct 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, the lawyer’s fees was paid by the university. That is the information we have, as a Ministry. view
• 27 Oct 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, in such transactions, most of the time, the purchaser pays his own lawyer. That is what the university did. view
• 27 Oct 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, the hon. Member’s question is valid. I want to brief the House that, as a Ministry, we have executed our mandate by recommending the names of the persons who are supposed to be appointed by the Office of the President. We are waiting for a feedback from the Office of the President. We are still going to remind them to try and fast-track this issue. Our job is to recommend and wait for a feedback. view
• 27 Oct 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, we will remind the other Ministry to do what it is supposed to do. However, as the Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology, we have done what is required of us within the procedures in Government. So, we will remind the other Ministry to do what it is supposed to do. view