Dullo Fatuma Adan

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 681 to 690 of 2120.

• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I agree with the sentiments made by Sen. Shiyonga, but for her to say that the recommendations are fake is out of order. She should say she does not agree with the recommendations. However, for her to say that they are fake is out of order. The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only.A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate. view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Let me take this opportunity to thank the Members of this Committee for their contribution. I do not know how many minutes I have to respond. view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: No, it cannot be five minutes. view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: That is okay. I might take less than that. Mr. Speaker, Sir, let me take this House through memory lane as far as the Managed Equipment Scheme (MES) is concerned. When the MES issue came up, it was first subjected to the Committee of the Whole. I remember very well that, that Committee was chaired by none other than Sen. Murkomen. That did not take even a week for them to come up with anything. Number two, the same MES issue was subjected to the Committee on Health. It did not go anywhere. It is this House that decided to ... view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only.A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate. view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, you can see some of the Senators standing here exonerating IKM which is very wrong because you have not even interacted with the Report. As far as the letter by Sen. Olekina is concerned, the contact is very clear where the original manufacturers must apply for the contract. However, the company he mentioned here, they are not the original manufacturers. The letter he is mentioning is just identifying them as the agents. However, they did not have power of Attorney to sign that contract. That is the reason why we said that investigations should be carried out. ... view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: As far as we are concerned, General Electric (GE) was not the original manufacturer. That is the reason we did not go ahead to interrogate them. If you look at Pages 312 and 313 of the current Report, it is very clear. We have said: “Investigate and prosecute.” You can refer to the Report. view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: Therefore, it is hypocritical for some Members to stand here and say that we did not touch anything on General Electric (GE). We have even said in the Report that they have conflict of interest as far as IKM is concerned because they had a relationship with IKM before the contract of MES Equipment. That is in the Report. view
• 29 Sep 2020 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, on the issue of what happens to the equipment at the end of the contract, the Report is very clear. We said that audit of that equipment be carried out. view