Emmanuel Wangwe

Parties & Coalitions

  • Not a member of any parties or coalitions

Email

e.wangwe@yahoo.com

Telephone

0735494114

Telephone

/0722494114

Emmanuel Wangwe

Hon. Emmanuel Wangwe is the current Majority Whip of the National Assembly.

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 631 to 640 of 1211.

  • 15 Oct 2020 in National Assembly: In addition to what the Leader of the Majority Party has explained, we also have a cadre of colleagues who did not manage to get committees. We would also be considerate to such colleagues through the committee on selection. Therefore, the extension of this period is needed and we would be requesting our colleagues to support this Procedural Motion. The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
  • 15 Oct 2020 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Speaker, I second. view
  • 15 Oct 2020 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Speaker. I rise to support the Report of the Departmental Committee on Defence and Foreign Relations on the Agreement between the Government of Italy and the Government of Kenya. Basically, I am supporting this Report based on mathematical movement. When the mathematical movement is positive, definitely, it means that all the indicators are in positive support of where it is moving. The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
  • 15 Oct 2020 in National Assembly: Hon. Speaker, there is a shift in the proposed agreement. First, there will be a benefit in terms of scholarships to the people of Kenya – 15 of them at a cost of Ksh2.6 million or 20,000 Euros for each. Compared to the Agreement of 1995, that is a positive development and it supports the whole Agreement. Secondly, in this Agreement there is a positive movement of 6.4 million Euros in terms of community projects. The 1995 Agreement was only speculative; it did not guarantee the exact amount of money that would go to community projects support. The leadership of ... view
  • 15 Oct 2020 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker. I rise to support the Motion. As a Member of the Departmental Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, I want to state that this is a timely Motion and a wake-up call. We are working on a principle: “If you do not plan today, you are planning to fail”. We will have elections in May 2022 and this preparation is key. I want to agree with the Vice-Chairman of the Committee that we pass the Motion as it is and correct what might come up later when the IEBC is on course. A lot ... view
  • 8 Oct 2020 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Deputy Speaker. First and foremost, history is important. We need to take cognisance of the fact that SFRTF came out of NCPB. That history must be well recognised. Therefore, to revert back is not an issue. view
  • 8 Oct 2020 in National Assembly: Let us not hide corruption. Let us not run away from what has been corruptly transferred elsewhere. The SFRTF was wound up. There is a clear dispute of Kshs1.8 billion which was paid erroneously. It is this transfer of Kshs1.8 billion that is under investigation today by the Public Investments Committee (PIC). Let us not transfer the functions of an institution to another one because there is something that has happened there which is making us to run away from it. view
  • 8 Oct 2020 in National Assembly: Otherwise, I support any kind of organisation that the Executive wants to do. It is very much within its mandate. Thank you, Hon. Deputy Speaker. view
  • 6 Oct 2020 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Speaker. I wish to make a comment on that response by the Committee on the Lihanda Gold Basin. I am a Member of that county. Ikolomani Constituency is my neighbour and the undertakings there are good. view
  • 6 Oct 2020 in National Assembly: I want to thank the Committee for the substantive response that they have given to us. However, I want to urge them to do one or two things on behalf of this belt. They should push for the conclusion of the regulations, so that our people can be paid. The Ministry says that it cannot pay the locals because there is no formula on how to pay them, in terms of the 5 per cent which is in law. As we all know, the Public Finance Management (PFM) Act says that you cannot send money where you have not put ... view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus