14 Dec 2010 in National Assembly:
The right time you should have said it was when I called the Minister. You should have indicated to the Chair that-- -
view
14 Dec 2010 in National Assembly:
Madam Minister, what do you have to say to his proposal?
view
14 Dec 2010 in National Assembly:
I do agree. Dr. Kones, that will be the position in view of the House having carried the amendment. I will treat it as withdrawn and go to Clause 5. Dr. Kones, do you have an amendment to Clause 5? Sorry, it has been pointed out to me that Dr. Kones has several amendments, and not just one, to Clause 4 and he is not making that clear. We have just dealt with the first one. Hon. Members, if you look at page 1097 of the Order Paper the Minister’s amendment relates to (e); so, (f), (g) and (h) are ...
view
14 Dec 2010 in National Assembly:
Dr. Kones, do you have anything to say?
view
14 Dec 2010 in National Assembly:
Dr. Kones, just explain to me how different that is from the amendment moved by the Minister, where two persons appointed by the Minister shall posses such knowledge and experience as the Minister considers beneficial to the Board.
view
14 Dec 2010 in National Assembly:
I refer you to Clause 4(v), which reads:- “Two person nominated by the Minister who posses such knowledge and experience that the Minister considers beneficial to the Board” Do you want that number increased to three?
view
14 Dec 2010 in National Assembly:
That is in relation to (h) but (g) is taken care of.
view
14 Dec 2010 in National Assembly:
What does the Committee say?
view
14 Dec 2010 in National Assembly:
I will let the House decide!
view
14 Dec 2010 in National Assembly:
I think that is not an issue we can canvass at this stage. I will let the House decide this issue!
view