Gitobu Imanyara

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 5221 to 5230 of 6851.

• 4 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Minister, you are actually anticipating debate. So, you are out of order. Do not anticipate debate that is coming to the House, probably, next Thursday. view
• 4 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Indeed, there is no quorum. Ring the Division Bell. view
• 4 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: Hon. Members, unfortunately, it looks as if we are unable to raise the necessary quorum. The House is, therefore, adjourned until Tuesday, 9th March, 2010, at 2.30 p.m. view
• 4 Mar 2010 in National Assembly: The House rose at 5.30 p.m. view
• 25 Feb 2010 in National Assembly: Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Sir, for this opportunity. After the adjournment yesterday I had the opportunity of talking to the whips and to my colleagues on both sides. During those consultations, the chair of the PSC indicated to me that he and his Committee are ready to table the proposed Constitution of Kenya in this House next week. Having weighed that assurance, and taking all things into consideration, I am convinced that if we do not prepare ourselves by putting the House Business Committee in place before Tuesday next week, the process of constitution-making may well be delayed. Therefore, weighing ... view
• 24 Feb 2010 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. Since the Order Paper indicates that it is Mr. Jakoyo Midiwo who should have been moving this Motion, should Mr. Thuo not have indicated that he is moving the Motion on behalf of Mr. Midiwo or, at least, amended the Order Paper? view
• 24 Feb 2010 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, like the majority of hon. Members who have spoken before me, I rise to oppose this Motion. Firstly, it does not comply with Standing Order No.158. It does not state which parliamentary parties have nominated these names that have been brought to this House. That is the first thing that this Motion should have set out. These names as read out by the Whips, should have indicated which parliamentary parties nominated them in order to comply with the Standing Orders. Secondly, this is supposed to be a Grand Coalition Government which is a coalition of parties. ... view
• 24 Feb 2010 in National Assembly: This is the last time. This time they will not get away with it. We need to learn to live by the rules that we set for ourselves. So, let the list go back; let them prepare a list showing which political parties nominated these people, when, how and when consultations were made and then come back to this House. I oppose. view
• 8 Dec 2009 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, the structures that were demolished must have taken several months, if not years, to construct. Where were the City Council officers when this construction was taking place to the extent that people settled before they moved in to demolish them? view
• 8 Dec 2009 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, given the list of malpractices that the Minister has cited as justification for removing this MD, would he agree with me that these malpractices could not have been taking place if the entire Board was functional? Therefore, if any disciplinary action was being taken, it should have involved the entire Board, rather than the MD, who has been very hardworking. We also know there has been a strike by workers and other stakeholders who are concerned with the management of New KCC. view