Irungu Kang'ata

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 881 to 890 of 1643.

• 28 Sep 2017 in Senate: Hon Member, if I may go back to my earlier ruling on points of order, I ruled that I shall be relaxed on the application of Standing Order 87(I). Therefore, I will not require Members to state the Standing Orders they will be raising their points of order on, because we are still on the learning curve. If I was to do that, I will limit and whittle down debate. Therefore, allow me to excuse the Senator from that requirement. However, going forward, once we are here long enough, we shall be strict on adherence to House procedures. Be that ... view
• 28 Sep 2017 in Senate: Do you want to be informed Senator? view
• 28 Sep 2017 in Senate: Yes you have the right. view
• 28 Sep 2017 in Senate: But your time is up. view
• 28 Sep 2017 in Senate: Notwithstanding your speech, your time is up. Hon. Senators, I have four requests from Sen. (Eng.) Mahamud, Sen. Cherargei, Sen. Seneta and Sen. Mwangi. I propose that each of you have one minute because of time. Let us have Sen. (Eng.) Mahamud. view
• 28 Sep 2017 in Senate: Thank you Senator, your time is up. Sen. Cherargei, before you make your contribution, I would like to draw your attention to Standing Order No.29(3) which I earlier read to you. It states that:- “On a day when the Senate is scheduled to adjourn to a day other than the next normal sitting day in accordance with the calendar, the Senate Majority Leader or another member of the Senate Business Committee shall move a Motion of adjournment which shall be debated for not more than two hours after which the Senate shall adjourn without question put.” The point is that ... view
• 28 Sep 2017 in Senate: Yes, Sen. Seneta. view
• 28 Sep 2017 in Senate: Yes, Sen. Mwangi. view
• 28 Sep 2017 in Senate: It was only one minute and I had given a direction. You are not supposed to speak because you had already spoken on this Motion. Sen. Pareno, what is your Point of Order? view
• 28 Sep 2017 in Senate: Thank you for that point of order. It is a valid point of order but the only problem is that you are inviting me to make the ruling past time. therefore, we rise. view