Justin Bedan Njoka Muturi

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 761 to 770 of 851.

• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, just to recollect, we had already dealt with the proposed subsection (b) and negatived it. When the Mover came to move the next subclauses (c) and (d), the Question was proposed, put and carried by even the hon. Members on the other side. view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir. The Assistant Minister says he is ready to move a further amendment to Clause 11(b) in the manner that he has proposed. However, he should be advised to put it in writing so that we know what it is that he is proposing. We are not opposed to the further amendment. view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, Mr. Githae has said they have no problem with the amendment to Clause 11(a), but he wants to move a further amendment to Clause 11(b) so that the words, "for a second but last term on the recommendation of the Board" immediately after word "appointment" are deleted. view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, we have no problem with that further amendment. view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: They are using excessive force! view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, in as much as I--- view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, in as much as it appears like it is obvious, I just wanted to get a clarification from the Assistant Minister in Clause 18(b), where they propose that the funds will be derived from, among others, such fees, fines, levies or other charges as the Minister may approve from time to time. I just wanted to ask the Assistant Minister to explain because there is a risk. If the Authority is created and the Minister approves that it will be imposing fines, we run the risk of that Authority operating on nothing else other than ... view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I have proposed an amendment which is to the effect that Clause 12 be deleted. The reason is that, that Clause as it stands now proposes that the Board will be the one to set the allowances of its members. That will be in conflict with the provisions of the State Corporations Act Cap.486. We had an occasion where the Attorney-General addressed the Public Investments Committee (PIC) on that particular matter. It is for that reason that I consulted the Minister before moving this amendment. view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I beg to move:- THAT, the new Clause 68 be further amended by inserting the word "be" between the words "shall' and "subject". The amended new Clause 68 would then read:- (1) No person shall operate a museum except in accordance with a licence granted by the Minister, which shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Minister may think fit. Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I think the omission is a mere typographical error. view
• 6 Jul 2006 in National Assembly: Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. I wish to say a few things about the proposed Witness Protection Bill. As some of my colleagues said yesterday, by passing this Bill, Kenya joins the list of other progressive nations around Africa which have for long seen the need towards a law that protects witnesses and, particularly, whistle blowers. I am guardedly using the term "whistle blowers" because, in the Bill, the Attorney-General has not distinguished what kind of offences it is proposed that witnesses will seek protection. In the Bill, the Attorney-General says that it is to protect witnesses or people ... view