Hon Moses Kipkemboi Cheboi

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 191 to 200 of 10403.

• 26 Jun 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, when Members are claiming some came here earliest, you recognise that I was the earliest here. I thank you for giving me the opportunity. I take this opportunity to also support the Bill that is before us here. I am a student of contract. Like yourself and many other lawyers here, you understand what happens when you go to law school. The first case that comes before you, before you even start the process of studying law itself, is one case called: “Carlisle v Carbolic Smoke Ball” It is an 1893 case which is the basis ... view
• 25 Jun 2019 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, I beg to report that the Committee of the whole House has considered the Presidential Memorandum on the Insurance (Amendment) Bill (National Assembly Bill No.21 of 2018) and its approval without amendments. view
• 18 Jun 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, I beg to report that a Committee of Supply has considered the Budget Estimates for the Financial Year 2019/2020 in respect of the following Votes… view
• 18 Jun 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, I surely know I am in trouble, but I will do what is my duty. Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, I beg to move that the Committee of Supply doth report to the House its consideration of the Budget Estimates for the Financial Year 2019/2020 in respect of Votes 1011, 1021, 1023, 1024, 1032, 1035, 1041, 1052, 1064, 1065, 1066, 1068, 1071, 1072, 1081, 1091, 1092, 1093, 1094, 1095, 1107, 1108, 1112, 1122, 1123, 1132, 1134, 1152, 1162, 1164, 1165, 1167, 1168, 1173, 1174 and 1175, and approved the same with amendments and seeks leave to sit ... view
• 11 Jun 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Speaker, I beg to move the following Motion: view
• 11 Jun 2019 in National Assembly: THAT, pursuant to the provisions of Standing Order 256 (Exemption of Business from the Standing Orders), this House resolves to exempt all petitions under section 34 of the Forest Conservation and Management Act (No. 34 of 2016)(Petitions for variation of boundaries or revocation of public forests) from the provisions of Standing Orders 223(k) (exclusion of annexures) and 227(2)(sixty-day limitation and exclusion of petitions from debate) in order to allow relevant documentary annexures, accommodate time for public participation and provide for the compulsory resolution of the House in approving or rejecting petitions for variation of boundaries or revocation of the registration ... view
• 11 Jun 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Speaker, Section 34 of the Forest Conservation and Management Act (No. 34 of 2016) which is about variation of boundaries and/or revocation of forests, provides an opportunity for any person to petition the National Assembly or the Senate for variation of boundaries of public forests or revocation of a registration of public forest or portion of a public forest. This particular Motion is a very basic one. Under normal circumstances and specifically under Section 227(2) of our Standing Orders, once petitions are committed to committees, they are, within 60 days, supposed to bring reports to the House and, therefore, ... view
• 11 Jun 2019 in National Assembly: Further, the petitions have to prove certain things. In this specific case about the Forest Conservation and Management Act, they have to prove that such variation or revocation does not affect or prejudice its value as a water catchment area, biodiversity, conservation, cultural sites, protection of forests or its use for educational, recreational, health and research purposes. Given the criteria factored into law, it becomes imperative for the House to consider such petitions thoroughly and effectively. It is with this in mind that we seek an exemption of provisions of Standing Orders 223(k) and 227(2) during consideration of such petitions. ... view
• 11 Jun 2019 in National Assembly: because, by the very nature of this petition submitted under this Act, it requires annexures, lists of proposed beneficiaries, intended variations or revocations and other adjudication documents that need to be presented together with the petition. So, it will not be okay if it is done in the normal way like other petitions are done, where there are no annexures. For example, in the case of Mt. Elgon, there is a list of beneficiaries. That needs to be scrutinised. Therefore, it is important we exempt it from Standing Order No. 223(k). On the other part, Standing Order No. 227 requires ... view
• 6 Jun 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Speaker, I beg to give notice of the following Motion: THAT, pursuant to provisions of Standing Order No.256 on exemption of business from Standing Orders, this House resolves to exempt petitions submitted under Section 34 of the Forest Conservation and Management Act, No.34 of 2016, which are petitions for variations of boundaries or revocation of public forest, from provisions of Standing Order Nos.223 and 227(2) in order to accommodate public participation and provide for obligatory resolution of the House approving or rejecting petitions for variation of boundaries or revocation of registration of public forests or a portion of public ... view