Mutahi Kagwe

Born

January 1958

Post

P. O. Box 41305 00100 Nairobi

Email

mkagwe@wananchi.com

Link

Facebook

Telephone

0722203067

Telephone

0722202175

Link

@@MutahiKagwe on Twitter

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 131 to 140 of 960.

  • 14 Jun 2016 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I meant President Uhuru Kenyatta’s administration. view
  • 14 Jun 2016 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, for the benefit of Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale, the Jubilee administration. It is an achievement for this Government to have reduced the cost of electricity connectivity from Kshs35,000 to Kshs15,000. At one time, it was announced that customers would be allowed to pay this Kshs15,000 in installments after connection. This The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate view
  • 14 Jun 2016 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir I just heard Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale say that the Deputy President is an investor in poles. Would it be possible for him to substantiate and prove, indeed that, that is the case? view
  • 9 Jun 2016 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, my comment on this is that we are at least happy that this Petition has not been brought by a Senator who is running against the governor of the said county because the Senator of that county is running for the Presidency and not governorship. Consequently, I believe that it is not out of vindictiveness but concern. The missing link between the complaints in the petitions is prosecution. This is because we have had so many petitions to the Senate Committee on Finance, Commerce and The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes ... view
  • 9 Jun 2016 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I support the Petitioner but seek that my colleagues address the bigger matter of what to do when we conclude those petitions. view
  • 9 Jun 2016 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, the response to the Statement was delegated to me by the Chairperson. We have it but it is not signed. Also, there is nothing showing ownership. Therefore, as a Committee we have decided to summon the Cabinet Secretary concerned to respond to those issues, not only to the Committee but to the whole House. With your indulgence, we would like to be given at least two weeks so that we can summon the Cabinet Secretary to come to the House and explain. view
  • 8 Jun 2016 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I also echo the sentiments raised by my Chairman. As you know, we work on the Budget Policy Statement together. It is something that is passed by both Houses. If you look back at the last two years, we were not there. We did not go for a Joint Parliamentary Sitting. This year, again, we are not there. So, it is now three consecutive years. If, indeed, it is an oversight, I think it is time to correct it. If it is not an oversight and there is a problem somewhere, then it is time to address ... view
  • 2 Jun 2016 in Senate: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. Could you give us guidance on the questions that are being asked regarding health? I think those questions are supposed to be directed to governors because health is a devolved function in the Fourth The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for information purposes only. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor, Senate view
  • 2 Jun 2016 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, allow me to ride on the same statement request. I would like to seek a clarification on the process of rehabilitation that the Government is putting in place. Whereas you can stop people from consuming illicit brews, the biggest problem is rehabilitation. People stop, give up and then in a couple of weeks go back again. So, could we be told what rehabilitation policy and systems are being put in place? view
  • 2 Jun 2016 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, I want to thank the Chairman for a very elaborate answer. The elephant in the room is in one of the statements he made; that is, “determination by the CBK to place the bank under receivership.” That statement is where the issues lie. Most of the answers given do not relate to the procedure, as it were, but the reasons why a bank can be placed under receivership. For example, I am aware that the period between when the directors of Imperial Bank Limited reported that they had noticed that there was fraud in the bank and ... view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus