9 May 2013 in National Assembly:
Hon. Chairlady, I just want a clarification by Leader of the Majority Party. Which particular section is he reading by saying that the Constitution is very clear that memorandum does not constitute part of the Bill? I am not very clear on that. Maybe he can inform us.
view
9 May 2013 in National Assembly:
Is hon. Mbadi in order to mislead this House by saying that the Tenth Parliament complied with Article 205 of the Constitution which specifically says that when a Bill that includes provisions dealing with the sharing of revenue---
view
9 May 2013 in National Assembly:
That is what I am raising. I am saying that the Constitution is very clear; when a bill of the nature that we are discussing today is published, and this one was published recently, the CRA is supposed to make its recommendations to this House as we consider this Bill. It is not the formula or the criterion for division of this money that is anticipated by Article 205. As we speak, what hon. Sakaja is saying is correct. What hon. Mbadi is saying is incorrect.
view
9 May 2013 in National Assembly:
I rise to support this amendment. We have just defeated an attempt to remove the clause providing for surcharging of officers in the county government for bringing court action. There is need for clarity in interpretation of the Act itself which is just about to be enacted. When you have these provisions, whenever they are acting on the Act, it is going to be very clear to anybody that this is the meaning of these clauses and expressions. I would want to tell this House, as much as we are saying that some of these things are not important, if ...
view
8 May 2013 in National Assembly:
Thank you, Hon. Speaker, Sir. I rise to support this Motion. I have had a look at the Bill that we are supposed to dispose of. This is the first time that this is happening since the new Constitution was promulgated. As it has been stated by the speaker before me, we will not have the advantage of going through this Bill after a committee has looked at it. There are quite a number of issues in this Bill, including an apparent dispute between the Commission on Revenue Allocation (CRA) and the National Treasury. We, therefore, as Members of this ...
view
8 May 2013 in National Assembly:
Thank you, Hon. Speaker, Sir. I rise to support this Motion. I have had a look at the Bill that we are supposed to dispose of. This is the first time that this is happening since the new Constitution was promulgated. As it has been stated by the speaker before me, we will not have the advantage of going through this Bill after a committee has looked at it. There are quite a number of issues in this Bill, including an apparent dispute between the Commission on Revenue Allocation (CRA) and the National Treasury. We, therefore, as Members of this ...
view
8 May 2013 in National Assembly:
On a point of order, hon. Deputy Speaker. I wish to seek your direction in respect of an issue that crops up from the provisions of Article 205 of the Constitution, which provides that:-
view
8 May 2013 in National Assembly:
â(1). When a Bill that includes provisions dealing with the sharing of revenue, or any financial matter concerning county governments is published, the Commission on Revenue Allocation shall consider those provisions and may make recommendations to the National Assembly and the Senate.
view
8 May 2013 in National Assembly:
(2) Any recommendations made by the Commission shall be tabled in Parliament, and each House shall consider the recommendations before voting on the Billâ.
view
8 May 2013 in National Assembly:
We are likely to conclude debate on this Bill tomorrow. I am, therefore, seeking directions that the House be informed if the Commission has, one, been informed of this Bill and two, whether it has made any recommendations in respect of this Bill and given them to the National Assembly and the Senate and, three, whether the recommendations can be represented or tabled before this House so that we can deal with them.
view