31 Oct 2023 in Senate:
Mr. Speaker, Sir, the jab has already landed. I can see it is working. I withdraw the jab. I beg the House that we go the route of a Committee that will enable us to interrogate the facts and interview witnesses. Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale will bear me witness that the last time we were in this similar committee, the witnesses would take oath there and you would subject them to cross- examination. The people who have experience with Plenary, such as Sen. Olekina - unless he was misleading me - has told me of a different story when it comes ...
view
31 Oct 2023 in Senate:
Mr. Speaker, Sir, with those many remarks, I second this Motion and hope that our colleagues will adopt the same and proceed in that particular fashion. I thank you.
view
31 Oct 2023 in Senate:
Mr. Speaker, Sir, I believe that this would fall under the ambit of anticipating debate. This is because what our colleague Senator is saying is that there is a desired result. If you go the same way, you will get the same results as the last time and that result was not desirable. Mr. Speaker, Sir, in accordance with your guidance, nobody should anticipate what result would arise from what process. That is what you guided us to do. So, he should refrain in his debate from suggesting that somehow--- The electronic version of the Senate Hansard Report is for ...
view
31 Oct 2023 in Senate:
By the way, there is no such thing as a second impeachment acting as an appeal. I have not read the facts and the allegations, but they are based on new facts and new allegations. They are being treated as a new case to be examined objectively based on the facts and evidence. So, he is out of order. I would wish that you would rule on that particular objection.
view
31 Oct 2023 in Senate:
On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir.
view
31 Oct 2023 in Senate:
Mr. Speaker, Sir, with your kind permission under Standing Order No. 109, I would now like to propose that we call the Mover to reply.
view
17 Oct 2023 in Senate:
Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker, Sir. I just wanted to lend my understanding of that Standing Order before you make your decision. In my reading of Standing Order No.55, what is not admissible are extracts and quotations. Those are two very clear things. For instance, I cannot take the version of the Daily Nation Newspaper today and copy-paste something that has been written there. That is an extract or a quotation. However, if you are relying on a report that is in the media that is not the same as a quotation or indeed an extract. So, we need ...
view
17 Oct 2023 in Senate:
Thank you, Madam Temporary Speaker. I rise, pursuant to Standing Order No.53 (1), to seek a Statement from the Standing Committee on Labour and Social Welfare, regarding the status of the ownership of the land of Tom Mboya Social Hall in Makadara Constituency. In the Statement, the Committee should- (1) State the current holder of the registered title for the land where the Tom Mboya Social Hall is situated; (2) Explain whether the social hall is still a public facility and if not, state when its ownership changed hands and provide the legal basis for the same; (3) Clarify the ...
view