Wahome Wamatinga

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 161 to 170 of 620.

• 24 Apr 2024 in Senate: Mr. Chairman, Sir, I propose that the Bill be amended by inserting the following new heading immediately after Clause 17. view
• 24 Apr 2024 in Senate: Mr. Chairman, Sir, I propose that the Bill be amended by inserting the following new heading immediately after Clause 17. view
• 24 Apr 2024 in Senate: Mr. Chairman, Sir, I beg your pardon for that. I beg to move: THAT, the Bill be amended by inserting the following new heading immediately after clause 17. PART III –LICENSING AND REGISTRATION view
• 24 Apr 2024 in Senate: Mr. Chairman, Sir, I beg your pardon for that. I beg to move: THAT, the Bill be amended by inserting the following new heading immediately after clause 17. PART III –LICENSING AND REGISTRATION view
• 24 Apr 2024 in Senate: Mr. Chairman, Sir, I beg to Move- THAT Clause 19 of the Bill be amended by- (a) deleting subclause (1) and substituting therefore the following new subclause - (1) A miller shall not purchase sugar crop from, or accept, sugar crop delivered by a grower and a grower shall not sell or deliver sugar crop to a miller, unless the- (a) grower is registered with, and has in force a valid supply agreement with the miller; (b) factory of the miller is situated within the grower’s sugarcane zone; or (c) grower is exempted from the requirement by the Board under ... view
• 24 Apr 2024 in Senate: Mr. Chairman, Sir, I beg to Move- THAT Clause 19 of the Bill be amended by- (a) deleting subclause (1) and substituting therefore the following new subclause - (1) A miller shall not purchase sugar crop from, or accept, sugar crop delivered by a grower and a grower shall not sell or deliver sugar crop to a miller, unless the- (a) grower is registered with, and has in force a valid supply agreement with the miller; (b) factory of the miller is situated within the grower’s sugarcane zone; or (c) grower is exempted from the requirement by the Board under ... view
• 24 Apr 2024 in Senate: Mr. Chairman, Sir, I beg to move- THAT, Clause 29 of the Bill be amended - (a) in subclause (1) by- (i) deleting paragraph (d) and substituting therefore the following new paragraph- (d) one person with knowledge of and experience in the operation of sugar industry nominated by the Council of County Governors; (ii) deleting the words “nominated by universities” appearing immediately after the words “one person” in paragraph (e) and substituting therefore the words “representing the universities nominated by the Commission on University Education”.; (b) by inserting the following new subclause immediately after subclause (1) — (1A) The Cabinet ... view
• 24 Apr 2024 in Senate: Mr. Chairman, Sir, I beg to move- THAT, Clause 29 of the Bill be amended - (a) in subclause (1) by- (i) deleting paragraph (d) and substituting therefore the following new paragraph- (d) one person with knowledge of and experience in the operation of sugar industry nominated by the Council of County Governors; (ii) deleting the words “nominated by universities” appearing immediately after the words “one person” in paragraph (e) and substituting therefore the words “representing the universities nominated by the Commission on University Education”.; (b) by inserting the following new subclause immediately after subclause (1) — (1A) The Cabinet ... view
• 24 Apr 2024 in Senate: Mr. Chairman, Sir, the rationale behind this amendment is the inclusion of the county government because agriculture being a devolved function, it was important to ensure that the CoG take part in the nomination of the board and the people who will run the board. Secondly, by changing and substituting, “nominated by universities” to “representing the universities nominated by the Commission on University Education”, ensures that it is also inclusive. Therefore, it does not claw back on the duties and the roles of the county government because this involves agriculture and it is a devolved function. view
• 24 Apr 2024 in Senate: Mr. Chairman, Sir, the rationale behind this amendment is the inclusion of the county government because agriculture being a devolved function, it was important to ensure that the CoG take part in the nomination of the board and the people who will run the board. Secondly, by changing and substituting, “nominated by universities” to “representing the universities nominated by the Commission on University Education”, ensures that it is also inclusive. Therefore, it does not claw back on the duties and the roles of the county government because this involves agriculture and it is a devolved function. view