Amos Kimunya

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 2791 to 2800 of 6175.

• 7 May 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move: THAT, the Schedule to the Bill be amended in the proposed amendments to the Technical and Vocational Education and Training Act, 2013— (2) by inserting the expression “(1)” immediately after the expression “s. 46”. (3) by inserting the following new paragraph immediately after the proposed new paragraph (ba) in the proposed amendments to section 46 – “Delete the word “three” appearing in paragraph (d)(iv) and substitute therefor the word “two”. You will find that the Bill is amending Section 46(1), but it does not state expressly so within the Bill. So we ... view
• 7 May 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move: THAT, the Schedule to the Bill be amended in the proposed amendments to the Technical and Vocational Education and Training Act, 2013 – view
• 7 May 2019 in National Assembly: The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposes only. Acertified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 7 May 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move: THAT, the Schedule to the Bill be amended in the proposed amendments to the Technical and Vocational Education and Training Act, 2013 – (5) by deleting the proposed amendments to Section 58. It is for the same reason having amended Section 2 then Section 58 is inconsequential. view
• 7 May 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. I have keenly listened to the Mover of this amendment and I beg to oppose it vehemently. The Mover alluded that Hon. Jude Njomo wants to cure a mischief. However, the mischief that Hon. Jude wants to create is to have a situation where somebody or some group of people donate land for a public institution, the public puts money in it, creates an institution and then one day down the line… This amendment is seeking to say that all such immovable property shall vest in the person under whose name the property is registered and ... view
• 7 May 2019 in National Assembly: We are having situations in this country where people purporting to be original trustees of land that was vested by the community in them to hold trust for the community have now started subdividing it and denying the institutions the fair title to the institutions. Public money has been invested in them and they are no longer protected. When we crafted the original provision in Section 16 of the existing Act, and I want Members to listen to this so that we can know, we put in very clearly that; “All such immovable property, shares, funds and securities as may ... view
• 7 May 2019 in National Assembly: In other words, the existing law covers protection of public funds. It also covers where land has been given by some donor, be it the Aga Khan Foundation or Kimunya Trust, but the condition that you put are protected by the law. However, when we are trying to open it up and say movable property be given to the board, immovable property be given to the original owner of the land, we are creating a situation like in those stories of “ Abunwasi ” where somebody tells me the land is mine, but the buses and the computers are yours. ... view
• 7 May 2019 in National Assembly: I thank you. view
• 7 May 2019 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. Indeed, you highlighted one of the things I wanted to highlight because within the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, it is very clear when a contract is deemed to be in force. It is from the time it is signed to the time a person is discharged of their responsibilities under the contract after the completion of the defect liability period. Basically, what the Member for Gatanga is trying to do is to now limit the contract to commencement and completion. Between signing and commencement, it is not covered. After finishing the works ... view
• 7 May 2019 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I happen to have had the responsibility to midwife this Act and operationalise it in 2006 and 2007. I have gone through it with a fine-tooth comb. The procurement professional does not just refer to a profession. It is somebody who is recognised within the Supplies Practitioners Management Act of 2007, which we passed to give room for the profession to be recognised. It was to ensure that we are not dealing with quacks but with somebody who is subjected to an institution that can provide disciplinary mechanisms for that procurement professional. If we delete the ... view