Charles Kilonzo

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 711 to 720 of 2469.

• 8 Mar 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, on page four, you will see the issues--- view
• 8 Mar 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I was getting to show you the conspiracy and how the document, indeed, landed to us, because even the House of Commons was divided on this issue. view
• 8 Mar 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, one is to make sure the arrests of the two presidential aspirants as they go to The Hague on the pretext that they going to be a security threat, and the arrest will ensure the investigations on President Kibaki is carried on. Then, later on, when is a former Head of State, they will be able to indict him. view
• 8 Mar 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, that is not the end. This is how William Hague landed. He was part of the conspiracy. If you look at the document, it says as follows: How they planned and how the visit will start. view
• 8 Mar 2012 in National Assembly: “With Kibaki himself now feeling vulnerable following the confirmation of both his closest advisors and his most likely successor as ICC guest, he is retreating further into comfort zone of passive rule, letting a group of hardliners advise him on issues like ICC. Neither we or the US, nor more moderate advisors have an icy way of assessing the President. We are trying through inter-mediaries” Now this is how William Hague came in. view
• 8 Mar 2012 in National Assembly: “But first, we need to send William Hague, as the high ranking diplomat to President Kibaki, among other issues to discuss” It goes on. The visit was not in good faith. It is part of a conspiracy, because the British Government has actually sat down, decided and condemned the President that he should be indicted. They were not comfortable because they knew this document was going to be leaked by people; this is what they suggested. If you look at Page 2, which is on policy choices, arguments and resource implications; number six says: view
• 8 Mar 2012 in National Assembly: “In the light of these circumstances, our advice is that Ministers do not push for a communication from the International Criminal Court (ICC) on the ongoing investigations of President Kibaki but focus---“ There is something missing. “What we need to do is to mitigate the risk of Kenya/African Union (AU) using the situation as an excuse. Since, with the current division in the United Kingdom (UK) and the European Union (EU) at large, the ditto process is likely to reach President Kibaki and the political players in Kenya and the AU.” That is how the document got here straight from ... view
• 8 Mar 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, now to my question; my colleagues will be able to raise other issues. This document is actually copied to the Hague. This document is copied to the Hague – somebody by the name Kanberg Hosen Bor(?), the Hague. view
• 8 Mar 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I want the Minister to clarify the following. Is the British Government a friendly state? Is the British Government in the process of trying to bring down the Kenyan Government? In the same document they have proposed to put pressure and issue travel bans. view
• 8 Mar 2012 in National Assembly: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I am seeking clarification as to whether the British Government is a friendly state. It is very clear that the visit by William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, was part of the conspiracy. So, could the Minister view