Daniel Kamuren Tuitoek

Parties & Coalitions

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 261 to 265 of 265.

  • 8 Nov 2017 in National Assembly: Secondly, these new urban centres require new roads to be paved. Like in Mogotio Town in Mogotio Constituency, when this paving of roads come later, there is a lot of disturbances in businesses. There is a lot of open drainage. Proper drainage is not in place. So, it is proper to have a proper policy to guide in development of these centres. view
  • 8 Nov 2017 in National Assembly: Information and Communication Technology (ICT) infrastructure is also one of the crucial areas which we need to plan, because as we move on, we expect most of the services to be provided online. We see a lot of wireless services being provided. If they are not incorporated in proper development policy planning of towns, then we get a problem. view
  • 8 Nov 2017 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, I support the Motion which is very important at this particular time. I beg to second. Thank you. view
  • 14 Sep 2017 in National Assembly: Thank you for giving me this opportunity. My name is Dr. Daniel Tuitoek from Mogotio Constituency. I would like to thank God for giving me this opportunity to be in this august House and being elected by the people of Mogotio to serve in this House for the next five years. I would also like to congratulate you and the Speaker for being elected to serve us for the next five years. I would also like to recognise and congratulate my fellow Members of Parliament for being elected to serve for the next five years. To touch on the President’s ... view
  • 14 Sep 2017 in National Assembly: largely semi-arid and, therefore, the issue of water is very important. Also, the issue of youth and women empowerment is another area which my constituents want me to address and, therefore, in the coming five years, I hope I will be able to assist in that particular direction. Concerning our fellow Opposition Members of Parliament, they seem not to be really assisting their members. When they say the President is not legally in place, they are actually going against the Constitution. If you look at the Constitution very clearly, it says that there will be no lacuna or a state ... view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus