James Nyikal

Parties & Coalitions

Born

22nd June 1951

Email

jwnyikal@yahoo.com

Telephone

0722753456

Telephone

0735481037

Dr. James Nyikal

Wanjiku's Best Representative - Health (National Assembly) - 2014

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 311 to 320 of 3161.

  • 30 Jun 2021 in National Assembly: I think I missed some point because the amendment is deleting. That means the PS will not be. It is not clear. view
  • 30 Jun 2021 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I rise to support the amendment. I want to seek some clarification. If you get to 30 years and what was supposed to be recovered has not been fully recovered, is there a provision in the Bill that deals with that kind of eventuality? The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
  • 30 Jun 2021 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I support that the amendment is good. It has no harm. I am just wondering about the numbering. Why are we numbering it as (ja) instead of just numbering it as paragraph (k) at the end? view
  • 30 Jun 2021 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I rise to support the amendment. I want to seek some clarification. If you get to 30 years and what was supposed to be recovered has not been fully recovered, is there a provision in the Bill that deals with that kind of eventuality? view
  • 30 Jun 2021 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I support that the amendment is good. It has no harm. I am just wondering about the numbering. Why are we numbering it as (ja) instead of just numbering it as paragraph (k) at the end? view
  • 30 Jun 2021 in National Assembly: I have a little concern with (b). When you talk of restrictive bidding, unless you qualify it, you open opportunities where bidding can be in such a way that it favours certain people. So, I am not sure whether the Committee looked at this in detail and why it was not there in the first place. I would propose that we remove this amendment of restricted bidding. view
  • 30 Jun 2021 in National Assembly: I have a little concern with (b). When you talk of restrictive bidding, unless you qualify it, you open opportunities where bidding can be in such a way that it favours certain people. So, I am not sure whether the Committee looked at this in detail and why it was not there in the first place. I would propose that we remove this amendment of restricted bidding. view
  • 30 Jun 2021 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I also agree with the principle as Hon. Oundo has said. There are issues that will relate to the Government itself and its processes. What about if there are issues that are actually beyond the people involved, which normally would go under force majeure or something unpreventable? I know it is not my area but I have heard it before. Do we need to bring that one in? It could be an issue that you sign a contract and then there is a flood or some uprising. How do we handle those occurrences? I just wanted ... view
  • 30 Jun 2021 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I also agree with the principle as Hon. Oundo has said. There are issues that will relate to the Government itself and its processes. What about if there are issues that are actually beyond the people involved, which normally would go under force majeure or something unpreventable? I know it is not my area but I have heard it before. Do we need to bring that one in? It could be an issue that you sign a contract and then there is a flood or some uprising. How do we handle those occurrences? I just wanted ... view
  • 30 Jun 2021 in National Assembly: There are three things that I have observed where I see inconsistencies. When we started with the procurement, we excluded private entities from the public procurement laws on that account. When we came to Clause 76, we excluded them from public audit. When we now come to Clause 82, we are bringing them back to Parliament. I do not see many private companies that would want this. I see a few inconsistencies there. I would like an explanation of why private companies were excluded from public procurement rules, public audit rules in Clause 76, yet now we are bringing the ... view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus