Joseph Kirui Limo

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 1121 to 1130 of 2163.

• 16 Oct 2018 in National Assembly: Hon. Chairman, I beg to move: view
• 16 Oct 2018 in National Assembly: THAT, Clause 26 Bill be amended— (a) by renumbering Clause 26 as 26(1); and (b) in sub clause (3)(b) by deleting the words “fifty per cent of his or her sponsor’s contribution” and substituting therefor the words “the sponsor’s contribution as may be prescribed by the Retirement Benefits Authority”. This is just housekeeping on numbering because we have Clause 26 and then 26(2). Therefore, we should introduce 26(1) so that we can move in sequence. This will be reasonable. This particular amendment is to be in compliance with the requirements of the Retirement Benefits Act. It says that where a ... view
• 16 Oct 2018 in National Assembly: Hon. Chairman, I beg to move: THAT, Clause 27(2) of the Bill be amended by deleting paragraph (d). view
• 16 Oct 2018 in National Assembly: This particular paragraph is about approving the age. We did not want the board to have discretion of approving the age of an individual because it is clear on the identification documents. Therefore, the discretion of the board to accept a written declaration of the date of birth by the member on first appointment is not necessary. The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposes only. Acertified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor. view
• 16 Oct 2018 in National Assembly: The Members who are moving out of the Chamber, please, do not interfere with my view. view
• 16 Oct 2018 in National Assembly: Hon. Chairman, I beg to move: THAT, Clause 28(2) of the Bill be amended by deleting paragraph (d). view
• 16 Oct 2018 in National Assembly: This is the same as the one before where we are removing the discretion of the board in proving the age of a member. view
• 16 Oct 2018 in National Assembly: Hon. Chairman, I beg to move: THAT, Clause 49(4) of the Bill be amended by deleting the words “five hundred thousand shillings, or in the case of a natural person, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, or to both” and substituting therefor the words “five million shillings, or in the case of a natural person, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or to both” view
• 16 Oct 2018 in National Assembly: This is for the purpose of harmonisation of penalties because elsewhere in the Bill it is providing for Kshs5 million and now it is contradicting itself by changing on Clause 49 to Kshs500,000. view
• 16 Oct 2018 in National Assembly: Just to clarify, Hon. Chairman, you know we were not actually comparing Kshs500,000 with three years, or Kshs5 million with two years. Rather, we were harmonising with Clause 48 where it is… In Clause 48, the offence is actually being fined Kshs5 million or imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or both. It is actually the same Bill. So, we are harmonising Clause 49 with Clause 48. We were actually saying we cannot… Now, when we reach Clause 49, it goes to Kshs500,000 and three years. view