Joshua Serem Kutuny

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 131 to 140 of 461.

• 7 Aug 2018 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move: THAT, Clause 18 of the Bill be amended— (a) in the proposed new section 133A— (i) by deleting sub-section (1) and substituting therefor the following new sub-section— (1) There is established a Tribunal to be known as the Land Acquisition Tribunal which shall consist of five persons appointed by the Cabinet Secretary through a notice in the Gazette. (ii) by inserting the following new sub-section immediately after sub- section (1)— (1A) The members of the Tribunal shall consist of — (a) one person appointed from among three persons nominated by the Judicial ... view
• 7 Aug 2018 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, I beg to move: THAT, Clause 18 of the Bill be amended— (a) in the proposed new section 133A— (i) by deleting sub-section (1) and substituting therefor the following new sub-section— (1) There is established a Tribunal to be known as the Land Acquisition Tribunal which shall consist of five persons appointed by the Cabinet Secretary through a notice in the Gazette. (ii) by inserting the following new sub-section immediately after sub- section (1)— The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposes only. Acertified version of this Report can be obtained from ... view
• 7 Aug 2018 in National Assembly: (1A) The members of the Tribunal shall consist of — (a) one person appointed from among three persons nominated by the Judicial Service Commission, who shall serve as the Chairperson; (b) two persons appointed from among five persons nominated by the Valuers Registration Board; (c) one person appointed from among three persons nominated by the Surveyors Registration Board; and (d) one person appointed from among two persons nominated by the Attorney-General.” (b) in the proposed new section 133C by deleting the words “ninety days” appearing in sub-section (3) and substituting therefor the words “sixty days”. The justification by the Committee ... view
• 7 Aug 2018 in National Assembly: I am a Member of that Committee and I am one of those who opposed the 90 days period for the tribunal to sort out any issue that is before it. Time is of essence particularly when it comes to issues of property. So, the proposed 90 days was too long a period, in my view. Therefore, we felt that it was important to shorten it. If a matter is before the tribunal, it must ventilate and finish within 60 days. view
• 7 Aug 2018 in National Assembly: Thank you. view
• 7 Aug 2018 in National Assembly: I am a Member of that Committee and I am one of those who opposed the 90 days period for the tribunal to sort out any issue that is before it. Time is of essence particularly when it comes to issues of property. So, the proposed 90 days was too long a period, in my view. Therefore, we felt that it was important to shorten it. If a matter is before the tribunal, it must ventilate and finish within 60 days. view
• 7 Aug 2018 in National Assembly: Thank you. view
• 7 Aug 2018 in National Assembly: It is very clear on the Order Paper, if only the Hon. Member can take his time and go through it. It is very clear and detailed. When it comes to the issue of the gazettement of the tribunal, it is the CS who is mandated to do the gazettement of the members of the tribunal. view
• 7 Aug 2018 in National Assembly: If the concern is technical, allow me to take Members through Clause 18. view
• 7 Aug 2018 in National Assembly: It is very clear on the Order Paper, if only the Hon. Member can take his time and go through it. It is very clear and detailed. When it comes to the issue of the gazettement of the tribunal, it is the CS who is mandated to do the gazettement of the members of the tribunal. view