Kipruto Moi

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 101 to 110 of 141.

• 1 Dec 2015 in National Assembly: Trade did. Did he withdraw the amendment of Clause 47? That was a wonderful amendment. view
• 1 Dec 2015 in National Assembly: I had intervened, but you did not give me a chance to speak. I wanted to say that the amendment was wonderful because it gives business persons an opportunity to get their money back. view
• 1 Dec 2015 in National Assembly: You did not check the board. view
• 1 Dec 2015 in National Assembly: Yes, I would like to support and congratulate Hon. Lang’at who is the Chairman of the Departmental Committee on Finance, Planning and Trade for the wonderful amendments he has made. It has made the business environment to be extremely friendly to the business community. I support him wholeheartedly. view
• 21 Oct 2015 in National Assembly: Thank you very much, Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, for the opportunity to contribute to this very important Motion. I agree with two of the amendments, but there is one which I oppose. I wholeheartedly support the amendment to Clause 20, which advocates for fair, prompt and full compensation. It protects people whose land will be damaged. Clause 30 makes the governor a member of the Mineral Rights Board and excludes the Cabinet Secretary (CS) for Devolution and Planning. That is extremely wise because in many instances, especially in the history of this country, if all decisions are to be made ... view
• 21 Oct 2015 in National Assembly: will be excluded from any benefit that may arise from the extraction of minerals. It is better to have the governor on that Board because he is duly elected by the people of his county. I do not agree with the Senate amendment to Clause 37. The clause provides that before we can prospect and mine we must seek the consent of the owner of that private land. However, the Senate amended that to say that we can only seek consent to mine and not to prospect. If we leave it that way, it means there will be so many ... view
• 26 Aug 2015 in National Assembly: Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I would like to reiterate what Hon. Gumbo has said. Clause 16 (6) says: “Any validity of any authorisation purporting to be issued cannot be challenged in any court of law in Kenya.” Knowing Kenya, if my property or goods are destroyed, I have no recourse because those people enjoy the same immunities as diplomats. So, why those vast amounts of power? view
• 26 Aug 2015 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. view
• 6 Aug 2015 in National Assembly: Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. Number one, as much as I would like to commend Hon. Korir for his patriotism, if we say foreign companies must give 30 per cent of their shareholding to Kenyans by birth, we will be discriminating against those who are Kenyans by registration. I could have a son who was born in the United States of America and 18 years later he moves to Kenya and becomes a citizen by registration. Number two is the fact that imposing 30 per cent local shareholding on any foreign company is very extreme. People who want to ... view
• 17 Jun 2015 in National Assembly: Thank you very much, Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker. I am a member of the Departmental Committee on Lands. I will not go into the details because the previous view