Richard Maoka Maore

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 361 to 370 of 551.

• 7 Dec 2006 in National Assembly: Order! Hon. Members, I think we are dealing with a delicate matter, and it is fair that what we can negotiate, we negotiate and what we can legislate on, we do it. Now, we are on the final leg of the negotiations. The issue is, the Minister is pegging his argument on what he is providing in Clause 17. view
• 7 Dec 2006 in National Assembly: Hon. Members, I am now going to put the question on the clause as amended. Clause 16(2) and (3) has been withdrawn. So, we are voting on Clause 16(1). That is the amendment by the President in the Memorandum we are dealing with. view
• 7 Dec 2006 in National Assembly: I am stating that whichever way we vote on the President's Memorandum, it will make relevant or irrelevant the amendment by Mr. J. Nyagah. It is the same thing. view
• 7 Dec 2006 in National Assembly: Let me make it clear. If we vote and it is agreed that, as the President proposes, this Section 44 is deleted, it will be the same as rejecting the amendment by hon. J. Nyagah. It is the same thing. view
• 7 Dec 2006 in National Assembly: Hon. Members, Mr. J. Nyagah's 4276 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES December 7, 2006 amendment seeks to delete the whole of Clause 16. view
• 7 Dec 2006 in National Assembly: In the President's Memorandum, he was saying that you retain Clause 16 (1) only. view
• 7 Dec 2006 in National Assembly: Now, let us dispose of one amendment at a time. view
• 7 Dec 2006 in National Assembly: You may now take your seats. You have the requisite numbers and I, therefore, order that the Division Bell be rung. view
• 6 Dec 2006 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir. This House expects public servants to tell the truth to the various Departmental Committees, the Public Accounts Committee and the Public Investments Committee, and not to mislead them. view
• 6 Dec 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, you are presiding over some business where a Minister is bluntly misleading the House. What do you say about it? view