Mohamed Faki Mwinyihaji

Parties & Coalitions

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 511 to 520 of 2123.

  • 8 Nov 2023 in Senate: tunasema talaka ni mara tatu. Unaweza kumpa mke talaka akaenda akarudi. Ukampa ya pili, akaenda akarudi. Ya tatu ndio huwa ya mwisho. Kwa hivyo, Gavana Kawira alikuja hapa mara ya kwanza mwaka jana na talaka haikuweza kupita. Kwa hivyo, ako na fursa nyingine kuja hapa kuangalia ni vipi atatatua matatizo yake. Ni masikitiko kwamba ushahidi uliotolewa haukuweza kuthibitisha makosa yaliyodaiwa kufanyika na Gavana Kawira. Ukiangalia makosa yote yaliyozungumziwa hapa na ushahidi uliyoletwa haukuweza kufikia kiwango kilichowekwa na Mahakama ya Upeo katika kuangalia maswala kama haya. Itakuwa ni dhuluma kubwa kuweza kumpeleka nyumbani Gavana Kawira Mwangaza kwa ushahidi ambao haukufikia kiwango ... view
  • 8 Nov 2023 in Senate: tunasema talaka ni mara tatu. Unaweza kumpa mke talaka akaenda akarudi. Ukampa ya pili, akaenda akarudi. Ya tatu ndio huwa ya mwisho. Kwa hivyo, Gavana Kawira alikuja hapa mara ya kwanza mwaka jana na talaka haikuweza kupita. Kwa hivyo, ako na fursa nyingine kuja hapa kuangalia ni vipi atatatua matatizo yake. Ni masikitiko kwamba ushahidi uliotolewa haukuweza kuthibitisha makosa yaliyodaiwa kufanyika na Gavana Kawira. Ukiangalia makosa yote yaliyozungumziwa hapa na ushahidi uliyoletwa haukuweza kufikia kiwango kilichowekwa na Mahakama ya Upeo katika kuangalia maswala kama haya. Itakuwa ni dhuluma kubwa kuweza kumpeleka nyumbani Gavana Kawira Mwangaza kwa ushahidi ambao haukufikia kiwango ... view
  • 7 Nov 2023 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, mine is to both the counsel for the County Assembly and the witness. There were proceedings before the High Court in Meru where the County Secretary, according to the ruling, was found guilty of contempt and the matter is still ongoing. The punishment has not been meted. Is that not subjecting the Governor to a double jeopardy because the proceedings before the court in Meru are still alive? The counsel for the Governor said earlier that they were in court this morning. Here, you want us to impeach the Governor based on the same set of facts. ... view
  • 7 Nov 2023 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, mine is to both the counsel for the County Assembly and the witness. There were proceedings before the High Court in Meru where the County Secretary, according to the ruling, was found guilty of contempt and the matter is still ongoing. The punishment has not been meted. Is that not subjecting the Governor to a double jeopardy because the proceedings before the court in Meru are still alive? The counsel for the Governor said earlier that they were in court this morning. Here, you want us to impeach the Governor based on the same set of facts. ... view
  • 7 Nov 2023 in Senate: Mr. Speaker, Sir, mine is to both the counsel for the County Assembly and the witness. There were proceedings before the High Court in Meru where the County Secretary, according to the ruling, was found guilty of contempt and the matter is still ongoing. The punishment has not been meted. Is that not subjecting the Governor to a double jeopardy because the proceedings before the court in Meru are still alive? The counsel for the Governor said earlier that they were in court this morning. Here, you want us to impeach the Governor based on the same set of facts. ... view
  • 7 Nov 2023 in Senate: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. view
  • 7 Nov 2023 in Senate: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. view
  • 7 Nov 2023 in Senate: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. view
  • 2 Nov 2023 in Senate: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, is the Senate Majority Whip in order to revisit a debate which was closed on Tuesday, this week, as to whether we go Plenary or Committee? A resolution of the House was made that we go the Plenary way and there is no need to revisit the issue. He is making the matter sub judice because he is getting calls from Meru over an issue that is pending before the House. view
  • 2 Nov 2023 in Senate: Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, is the Senate Majority Whip in order to revisit a debate which was closed on Tuesday, this week, as to whether we go Plenary or Committee? A resolution of the House was made that we go the Plenary way and there is no need to revisit the issue. He is making the matter sub judice because he is getting calls from Meru over an issue that is pending before the House. view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus