Raila Amolo Odinga

Born

7th January 1945

Post

P.O. Box 41842, Nairobi

Post

Parliament Buildings
Parliament Rd.
P.O Box 41842 – 00100
Nairobi, Kenya

Email

railaaodinga@yahoo.com

Email

Langata@parliament.go.ke

Email

info@railaforpresident2012.com

Link

Facebook

Web

http://www.railaforpresident2012.com

Telephone

0733220556

Telephone

+254 700 719 943

Telephone

0721233435

Telephone

0733620736

Link

@railaodinga on Twitter

Rt. Hon.(Eng) Raila Amolo Odinga

Raila Odinga served as Prime Minister of Kenya, and was the MP of Langata between 1992 and March 2013. He came third in the 1997 Presidential election and as ODM candidate was runner up to Mwai Kibaki in the 2007 Presidential Election. In 2013 he unsuccessfully contested the Presidential elections that saw Uhuru Kenyatta declared the 4th President. In 2017 he successfully contested the August 8th polls that saw the Supreme Court nullify the elections. He nonetheless absconded the fresh October 26th polls that saw President Uhuru re-elected for another final term.

All parliamentary appearances

Entries 1631 to 1640 of 1732.

  • 2 May 2006 in National Assembly: May 2, 2006 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES 841 view
  • 2 May 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, that is a very strong statement about what was happening in our society at that time. Today, I know that we would not allow such a record to be sold and that musician would be arrested and prosecuted. He would not be committing any offence known in law at the moment. Even if we were to arrest and prosecute him now, the court would still find him innocent. That is the reason why it is important for us, as a Parliament, to come up with laws that will protect our women. I have been to ... view
  • 2 May 2006 in National Assembly: The Government will take care! view
  • 2 May 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Temporary Deputy Speaker, Sir, actually, he wanted to give me information. He wanted to tell me that, if the rapist is jailed for life, he cannot be able to provide for the child. Therefore, a provision should be made for the Government to provide for such a child until he or she becomes an adult. We have had cases in British courts about Kenyan women who were raped by British soldiers. The figure varies from 600 to about 800. Some of them were injured in the process because they were gang-raped. Some of them conceived and gave birth to ... view
  • 26 Apr 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, the Question refers to those who were displaced in 1992. We are now in the year 2006. When this Government took over in 2003, it promised to resettle those people immediately. In football terms, this Government is living on injury time and yet, it is talking about a committee that was set up in 2004. Does the Assistant Minister believe that this Government will be able to resettle those people before its time is up? The referee is actually carrying the whistle right now! view
  • 26 Apr 2006 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Speaker, Sir. view
  • 26 Apr 2006 in National Assembly: Mr. Speaker, Sir, the Assistant Minister is not answering the question properly. The Chair has put this issue of special circumstances very clearly. Yesterday, when we were discussing the Supplementary Estimates, we were told that part of the increase in Recurrent Expenditure was to deal with this kind of a situation. How much of that money that we voted yesterday has been earmarked to deal with a situation like this one? view
  • 26 Apr 2006 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. This is a very important matter but, unfortunately, Members are consulting loudly. If they are not interested, they can actually go out! 742 PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES April 26, 2006 view
  • 26 Apr 2006 in National Assembly: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. view
  • 26 Apr 2006 in National Assembly: Thank you very much for that ruling that this matter should be treated with the seriousness that it deserves. Subclause 1 must be read together with Subclause 2. Subclause 1 spells out the offences. If only the hon. Member had read Sub-clause 2, he would not have made the offensive remark against our colleagues. This Bill has nothing to do with marriage and the offences are clearly specified. view

Comments

(For newest comments first please choose 'Newest' from the 'Discussion' tab below.)
comments powered by Disqus